ArticleBMC health services research2011
Physicians' propensity to collaborate and their attitude towards EBM: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dissecting medical referrals in health services: role of physician professional networks.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Network approaches and interventions in healthcare settings: A systematic scoping review.PloS one · 2023Article
- Review of social networks of professionals in healthcare settings-where are we and what else is needed?Globalization and health · 2021Review
- A Social Network Analysis Approach for Contact Tracing in the Hospital Setting.Delaware journal of public health · 2020Article
- How the study of networks informs knowledge translation and implementation: a scoping review.Implementation science : IS · 2019Article
- Identifying Key Players in the Care Process of Patients with Diabetes Using Social Network Analysis and Administrative Data.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2018Article
- Unfolding similarity in interphysician networks: the impact of institutional and professional homophily.BMC health services research · 2015Article
- "Us and them": a social network analysis of physicians' professional networks and their attitudes towards EBM.BMC health services research · 2013Article
- Obesity, Complexity, and the Role of the Health System.Current obesity reports · 2013Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe healthcare management literature states that physicians often coordinate their activities within and between organizations through social networks. Previous studies have also documented the relationship between professional networks and physicians' attitudes toward evidence-based medicine (EBM). The present study sought associations between physicians' self-reported attitudes toward EBM and the formation of inter-physician collaborative network ties.
methodsPrimary data were collected from 297 clinicians at six hospitals belonging to one of the largest local health units of the Italian National Health Service. Data collection used a survey questionnaire that inquired about professional networks and physicians' characteristics. Social network analysis was performed to describe inter-physician professional networks. Multiple regression quadratic assignment procedures were performed to assess the relationship between self-reported attitudes toward EBM and clinicians' propensity to collaborate.
resultsPhysicians who reported similar attitudes toward EBM were more likely to exchange information and advice through collaborative relationships (β = 0.0198; p < 0.05). Similarities in other characteristics, such as field of specialization (β = 0.1988; p < 0.01), individual affiliations with hospital sites (β = 0.0845; p < 0.01), and organizational clinical directorates (β = 0.0459; p < 0.01), were also significantly related to physicians' propensity to collaborate.
conclusionsCommunities of practice within healthcare organizations are likely to contain separate clusters of physicians whose members are highly similar. Organizational interventions are needed to foster heterophily whenever multidisciplinary cooperation is required to provide effective health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.