ArticleCritical care (London, England)2011
Women receive more trials of noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure than men: a nationwide population-based study.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gender-Based Differences in COPD Patients with Type 2 Respiratory Failure-Impact on Clinical Practice.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Observational
- Why Are Men More Restrained in the Intensive Care Unit?Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2024Article
- Sex differences in the use of mechanical ventilation in a neurointensive care population: a retrospective study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Article
- The Association of Nonmodifiable Patient Factors on Antipsychotic Medication use in the Intensive Care Unit.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2024Article
- Sex Differences in Mortality of ICU Patients According to Diagnosis-related Sex Balance.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2022Article
- Gender- and age-based differences in outcomes of mechanically ventilated ICU patients: a Chinese multicentre retrospective study.BMC anesthesiology · 2022Observational
- Article
- Is access to intensive care equitable?Critical care (London, England) · 2018Article
- The secular trends in the incidence rate and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Taiwan--a nationwide population-based study.PloS one · 2015Article
- Year in review 2011: Critical Care--Resource management.Critical care (London, England) · 2012Review
- MAgEC: Using Non-Homogeneous Ensemble Consensus for Predicting Drivers in Unexpected Mechanical Ventilation.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational ScienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPrevious studies in western countries have observed that women are less likely than men to receive intensive care and mechanical ventilation (MV). We aimed to investigate whether the gender difference also exists in Asian populations and in the provision of different types of MV including invasive (INV) and noninvasive ventilation (NIV).
methodsWe analyzed all adult hospital patients between 2005 and 2007 in the claims data from 1,000,000 randomly selected people in the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. NIV-only was defined as patients receiving NIV as the only ventilator treatment during hospitalization. Gender difference was assessed using multivariable analyses with/without considering a hospital cluster effect by generalized estimating equations models. Subgroup analyses for gender difference in NIV use were performed using propensity score matching method.
resultsOf the 128,327 patients enrolled, 53.8% were men, 9.2% received intensive care and 5.2% used MV. After adjusting for potential confounders, women were less likely than men to receive intensive care (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.82) and MV (aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.78-0.91). Among MV patients, 6.8% received NIV-only; the proportion of which was higher in women than in men (8.6% vs. 5.7%, P < 0.001). After controlling for confounders and a cluster effect, women remained more likely to receive NIV-only (aOR 1.61, 95% CI 1.32-1.96). Subgroup analyses showed that patients with underlying congestive heart failure (CHF) had the highest difference in the provision of NIV-only (female-to-male aOR 2.76, 95% CI 1.38-5.53). A hospital cluster effect on the gender difference in NIV use was found in patients with diseases other than chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and CHF.
conclusionsGender differences existed not only in the provision but also in the types of MV. Further studies are needed to understand why gender differences occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.