Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21787225›Full record

ReviewInternational reviews of immunology2011

Important lessons derived from animal models of celiac disease.

E V Marietta, C S David, J A Murray

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International reviews of immunology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Current Status of Celiac Disease Drug Development.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2016
    Review
  6. Celiac disease as an autoimmune condition.Central-European journal of immunology · 2014
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E V MariettaDepartment of Immunology, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
C S David
J A Murray
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

A HLA Mouse Model for Gluten Sensitivity and EnteropathyR01DK071003 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MURRAY, JOSEPH A · 2006 to 2009
$1.1M
A HLA Mouse Model for Gluten Sensitivity and EnteropathyR56DK071003 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MURRAY, JOSEPH A · 2010 to 2010
$394k
NIDDK NIH HHS DK071003NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK071003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several animal models have been recently developed to recapitulate various components of the complex process that is celiac disease. In addition to the increasing diversity of murine models there are now monkey models of celiac disease. Mouse strains and protocols have been developed that are now just beginning to address the complex interactions among the innate and adaptive immune responses to gluten, as well as gluten-dependent autoimmunity in celiac disease. The most important conclusion that these models have provided us with so far is that while all three components (innate gluten sensitivity, adaptive gluten sensitivity, and autoimmunity) are independent phenomena, all are necessary for celiac disease to develop.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAdaptive ImmunityAnimalsAutoimmunityCeliac DiseaseDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGlutensHaplorhiniHLA-DQ AntigensHumansImmunity, InnateMiceMice, TransgenicGlutensHLA-DQ8 antigenHLA-DQ Antigens

Identifiers

PMID21787225
PMCPMC3480308
OpenAlexW2171662515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.