ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2011
Evolving methods for single nucleotide polymorphism detection: Factor V Leiden mutation detection.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe many techniques used to diagnose the Factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation, the most common hereditary hypercoagulation disorder in Eurasians, and the most frequently requested genetic test reflect the evolving strategies in protein and DNA diagnosis.
methodsHere, molecular methods to diagnose the FVL mutation are discussed.
resultsProtein-based detection assays include the conventional functional activated protein C resistance coagulation test and the recently reported antibody-mediated sensor detection; and DNA-based assays include approaches that use electrophoretic fractionation e.g., restriction fragment length polymorphism, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, and single-stranded conformational PCR analysis, DNA hybridization (e.g., microarrays), DNA polymerase-based assays, e.g., extension reactions, fluorescence polarization template-directed dye-terminator incorporation, PCR assays (e.g., amplification-refractory mutation system, melting curve analysis using real-time quantitative PCR, and helicase-dependent amplification), DNA sequencing (e.g., direct sequencing, pyrosequencing), cleavase-based Invader assay and ligase-based assays (e.g., oligonucleotide ligation assay and ligase-mediated rolling circle amplification).
conclusionThe method chosen by a laboratory to diagnose FVL not only depends on the available technical expertise and equipment, but also the type, variety, and extent of other genetic disorders being diagnosed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.