Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21786095›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2011

Role of ¹¹C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography in evaluating patients affected by prostate cancer with suspected relapse due to prostate-specific antigen elevation.

Francesco Bertagna, Muhannad Abuhilal, Giovanni Bosio, Claudio Simeone, Pierluigi Rossini, Claudio Pizzocaro, Emanuela Orlando, Marco Finamanti, Giorgio Biasiotto, Carlo Rodella and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Role ofMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2024
    Article
  3. Clinical implications of PET/CT in prostate cancer management.Translational andrology and urology · 2018
    Review
  4. The use of PET/CT in prostate cancer.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2018
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Predictive factors ofEJNMMI research · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Francesco BertagnaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili di Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia 25123, Italy. francesco.bertagna@spedalicivili.brescia.it
Muhannad Abuhilal
Giovanni Bosio
Claudio Simeone
Pierluigi Rossini
Claudio Pizzocaro
Emanuela Orlando
Marco Finamanti
Giorgio Biasiotto
Carlo Rodella
Sergio Cosciani Cunico
Raffaele Giubbini

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of (11)C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in restaging patients affected by prostate cancer and suspected relapse due to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) increase. We also aimed to determine a PSA cutoff that is most suited to the study in terms of best compromise between sensitivity and specificity. Secondary endpoints were a comparison between (11)C-choline PET/CT and histological results, clinical findings, and radiological imaging (CT and magnetic resonance imaging). MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively evaluated 210 patients (median ± SD age 70 ± 7 years) affected by prostate cancer who underwent (11)C-choline PET/CT.

results(11)C-choline PET/CT imaging was positive in 116 (55.2%) patients and negative in 94 (44.8%). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the highest accuracy (sensitivity 76.8%, specificity 92.5%) for the whole population was achieved when the PSA level of 1.26 ng/ml level was used as the cutoff value for interpreting the results (P = 0.0001 and the area under the ROC curve AUC 0.897). For patients treated with surgery or surgery plus radiotherapy the cutoff was 0.81 ng/ml (sensitivity 73.2%, specificity 86.1%). For patients treated with radiotherapy alone, the cutoff was 2.0 ng/ml (sensitivity 81.8%, specificity 92.9%).

conclusionOur results indicate that (11)C-choline PET/CT is a useful diagnostic tool in patients affected by prostate cancer and a relapsed PSA level. The highest accuracy for all patients is obtained with a PSA cutoff level of 1.26 ng/ml, above which the imaging study is performed (0.81 ng/ml for patients treated with surgery or surgery plus radiotherapy and 2.0 ng/ml for patients treated with radiotherapy alone).

Indexed as

CholinePositron-Emission TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedContrast MediaEndpoint DeterminationHumansMaleMultimodal ImagingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOrganometallic CompoundsProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityCholineContrast MediagadobutrolOrganometallic CompoundsProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.