Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21785912›Full record

ReviewAAPS PharmSciTech2011

Non-impactor-based methods for sizing of aerosols emitted from orally inhaled and nasal drug products (OINDPs).

Jolyon Mitchell, Richard Bauer, Svetlana Lyapustina, Terrence Tougas, Volker Glaab

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Particle sizing of pharmaceutical aerosols via direct imaging of particle settling velocities.European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jolyon MitchellTrudell Medical International, London, Ontario, Canada.
Richard Bauer
Svetlana Lyapustina
Terrence Tougas
Volker Glaab
Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEBoehringer Ingelheim (United States) · USTrudell Medical International (Canada) · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to review non-impactor-based methods for measuring particle size distributions of orally inhaled and nasal pharmaceutical aerosols. The assessment of the size distributions of sprays and aerosols from orally inhaled and nasal drug products by methods not involving multi-stage cascade impaction may offer significant potential advantages in terms of labor savings and reducing the risk for operator-related errors associated with complex-to-undertake impactor-based methods. Indeed, in the case of nasal spray products, cascade impaction is inappropriate and alternative, and preferably non-invasive methods must be sought that minimize size-related bias associated with the measurement process for these relatively large droplets. This review highlights the options that are available to those involved with product quality assessments, providing guidance on relative strengths and weaknesses, as well as highlighting precautions that should be observed to minimize bias. The advent of Raman chemical imaging, which enables an estimate to be made of the proportion of each particle comprising active pharmaceutical ingredient(s) (APIs), necessitates a re-think about the value of classical microscopy image analysis as now being capable of providing API-relevant information from collected aerosols and sprays.

Indexed as

Particle SizeAdministration, InhalationAerosolsEquipment DesignHumansMaterials TestingNebulizers and VaporizersPharmaceutical PreparationsSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredSuspensionsTechnology, PharmaceuticalAerosolsPharmaceutical PreparationsSuspensions

Identifiers

PMID21785912
PMCPMC3167264
OpenAlexW2028289480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.