Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21785860›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2012

Effects of epoprostenol and sildenafil on right ventricular function in hypoxic volunteers: a tissue Doppler imaging study.

Adriana Pavelescu, Robert Naeije

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Pulmonary Hypertension in Acute and Chronic High Altitude Maladaptation Disorders.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adriana PavelescuDepartment of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine of the Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Robert Naeije
Erasmus Hospital · BEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sildenafil and epoprostenol are effective therapies in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Both drugs increase cardiac output, which has been in part attributed to improved right ventricular (RV) contractility. We therefore used tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) to test whether sildenafil and epoprostenol might differently affect RV function in normal subjects before and after induction of acute hypoxic pulmonary hypertension. Ten healthy volunteers underwent this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study. Echocardiographic measurements were obtained 60 min after the intake of a placebo or 50 mg sildenafil or under 8 ng/kg/min iv epoprostenol, in normoxia or after 60 min of hypoxic breathing (FIO(2) of 0.12). Right ventricular systolic function was assessed by systolic strain (ε), strain rate (SR), isovolumic contraction acceleration (IVA) and tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and diastolic function by tricuspid annulus E/A ratio and isovolumic relaxation time related to RR interval (IRT/RR). Pulmonary artery pressure was calculated from the acceleration time of pulmonary flow and cardiac output from the left ventricular outflow tract flow-velocity. Hypoxia increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) by 78%, did not affect indices of RV systolic function, decreased E/A and increased IRT/RR. Epoprostenol more than sildenafil increased cardiac output, apical ε and TAPSE, the latter in proportion to decreased PVR. In addition, apical SR was increased only by epoprostenol. None of the drugs affected IVA, basal SR, E/A and IRT/RR. These results are not suggestive of intrinsic positive inotropic effects of either sildenafil or epoprostenol at maximal doses tolerated by normal subjects.

Indexed as

Echocardiography, DopplerAdultAnalysis of VarianceAntihypertensive AgentsBelgiumBlood PressureCardiac OutputCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodEpoprostenolFemaleHeart RateHumansHypertension, PulmonaryHypoxiaLeast-Squares AnalysisAntihypertensive AgentsEpoprostenolPiperazinesPlacebosPurinesSildenafil CitrateSulfones

Identifiers

PMID21785860
OpenAlexW2036142670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.