Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21785423›Full record

ArticleNature cell biology2011

Cytoskeletal polarity mediates localized induction of the heart progenitor lineage.

James Cooley, Stacia Whitaker, Sarah Sweeney, Scott Fraser, Brad Davidson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature cell biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Transgenic Techniques for Investigating Cell Biology During Development.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2016
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Invadosomes in their natural habitat.European journal of cell biology · 2014
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

James CooleyDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Molecular Cardiovascular Research Program, University of Arizona, Arizona 85724, USA.
Stacia Whitaker
Sarah Sweeney
Scott Fraser
Brad Davidson
University of Arizona · USCalifornia Institute of Technology · USImaging Center · US

Funding

Signaling pathways in early heart developmentR01HL091027 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI DAVIDSON, BRADLEY J · 2008 to 2012
$1.9M
Signaling Pathways in Early Heart DevelopmentK02HL103788 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI DAVIDSON, BRADLEY J · 2010 to 2011
$199k
NHLBI NIH HHS 3R01HL091027-01A1S1NHLBI NIH HHS K02 HL103788NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL091027NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL091027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells must make appropriate fate decisions within a complex and dynamic environment. In vitro studies indicate that the cytoskeleton acts as an integrative platform for this environmental input. External signals regulate cytoskeletal dynamics and the cytoskeleton reciprocally modulates signal transduction. However, in vivo studies linking cytoskeleton/signalling interactions to embryonic cell fate specification remain limited. Here we show that the cytoskeleton modulates heart progenitor cell fate. Our studies focus on differential induction of heart fate in the basal chordate Ciona intestinalis. We have found that differential induction does not simply reflect differential exposure to the inductive signal. Instead, pre-cardiac cells employ polarized, invasive protrusions to localize their response to an ungraded signal. Through targeted manipulation of the cytoskeletal regulator CDC42, we are able to depolarize protrusive activity and generate uniform heart progenitor fate specification. Furthermore, we are able to restore differential induction by repolarizing protrusive activity. These findings illustrate how bi-directional interactions between intercellular signalling and the cytoskeleton can influence embryonic development. In particular, these studies highlight the potential for dynamic cytoskeletal changes to refine cell fate specification in response to crude signal gradients.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically Modifiedcdc42 GTP-Binding ProteinCell LineageCell PolarityCiona intestinalisCytoskeletonEmbryonic InductionEmbryonic Stem CellsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHeartModels, BiologicalSignal Transductioncdc42 GTP-Binding Protein

Identifiers

PMID21785423
PMCPMC3149722
OpenAlexW2011769321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.