Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21784921›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2011

Characterization of two distinct glycosyl hydrolase family 78 alpha-L-rhamnosidases from Pediococcus acidilactici.

Herbert Michlmayr, Walter Brandes, Reinhard Eder, Christina Schümann, Andrés M del Hierro, Klaus D Kulbe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. α-L-rhamnosidase: production, properties, and applications.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Herbert MichlmayrDepartment of Food Sciences and Technology, Division of Food Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria. herbert.michlmayr@boku.ac.at
Walter Brandes
Reinhard Eder
Christina Schümann
Andrés M del Hierro
Klaus D Kulbe
BOKU University · ATHöhere Bundeslehranstalt und Bundesamt für Wein- und Obstbau · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 20246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

α-L-Rhamnosidases play an important role in the hydrolysis of glycosylated aroma compounds (especially terpenes) from wine. Although several authors have demonstrated the enological importance of fungal rhamnosidases, the information on bacterial enzymes in this context is still limited. In order to fill this important gap, two putative rhamnosidase genes (ram and ram2) from Pediococcus acidilactici DSM 20284 were heterologously expressed, and the respective gene products were characterized. In combination with a bacterial β-glucosidase, both enzymes released the monoterpenes linalool and cis-linalool oxide from a muscat wine extract under ideal conditions. Additionally, Ram could release significant amounts of geraniol and citronellol/nerol. Nevertheless, the potential enological value of these enzymes is limited by the strong negative effects of acidity and ethanol on the activities of Ram and Ram2. Therefore, a direct application in winemaking seems unlikely. Although both enzymes are members of the same glycosyl hydrolase family (GH 78), our results clearly suggest the distinct functionalities of Ram and Ram2, probably representing two subclasses within GH 78: Ram could efficiently hydrolyze only the synthetic substrate p-nitrophenyl-α-L-rhamnopyranoside (V(max) = 243 U mg(-1)). In contrast, Ram2 displayed considerable specificity toward hesperidin (V(max) = 34 U mg(-1)) and, especially, rutinose (V(max) = 1,200 U mg(-1)), a disaccharide composed of glucose and rhamnose. Both enzymes were unable to hydrolyze the flavanone glycoside naringin. Interestingly, both enzymes displayed indications of positive substrate cooperativity. This study presents detailed kinetic data on two novel rhamnosidases, which could be relevant for the further study of bacterial glycosidases.

Indexed as

Acyclic MonoterpenesEnzyme InhibitorsEnzyme StabilityEthanolGene ExpressionGlycoside HydrolasesHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationKineticsMonoterpenesPediococcusRecombinant ProteinsTerpenesWineAcyclic Monoterpenesalpha-L-rhamnosidasecitronellolEnzyme InhibitorsEthanolgeraniolGlycoside HydrolaseslinaloolMonoterpenesRecombinant ProteinsTerpenes

Identifiers

PMID21784921
PMCPMC3187141
OpenAlexW2116638825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.