ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2011
Temporal variation and host association in the Campylobacter population in a longitudinal ruminant farm study.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seasonal dynamics, antimicrobial resistance, and genetic lineages of thermotolerantScience in One Health · 2026Article
- Multi-omics analysis revealed coordinated responses of rumen microbiota and epithelium of goats to dietary supplementation of glucosamine selenium.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2025Article
- Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Review
- Whole genome characterization of thermophilicFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Progressive microbial adaptation of the bovine rumen and hindgut in response to a step-wise increase in dietary starch and the influence of phytogenic supplementation.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Zoonotic Transmission ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Determinants ofParasitology · 2021Article
- Unveiling the Bovine Epimural Microbiota Composition and Putative Function.Microorganisms · 2021Article
- Emission Sources of Campylobacter from Agricultural Farms, Impact on Environmental Contamination and Intervention Strategies.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2021Article
- High-resolution sweep metagenomics using fast probabilistic inference.Wellcome open research · 2020Article
- Gene pool transmission of multidrug resistance among Campylobacter from livestock, sewage and human disease.Environmental microbiology · 2019Article
- Campylobacter and Arcobacter species in food-producing animals: prevalence at primary production and during slaughter.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2019Review
- Occurrence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- High Prevalence of Fluoroquinolone-ResistantApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019Article
- The evolution of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015Review
- Cryptic ecology among host generalist Campylobacter jejuni in domestic animals.Molecular ecology · 2014Article
- Genotypes, Antibiotic Resistance, and ST-8 Genetic Clone in Campylobacter Isolates from Sheep and Goats in Grenada.Veterinary medicine international · 2014Article
- Scientific Opinion on the public health hazards to be covered by inspection of meat from sheep and goats.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2013Article
- Article
- Differences in the fecal concentrations and genetic diversities of Campylobacter jejuni populations among individual cows in two dairy herds.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli were quantified and typed, using multilocus sequence typing (MLST), from fecal samples collected from a mixed cattle and sheep farm during summer. Cattle had a significantly higher prevalence than sheep (21.9% [74/338] and 14.0% [30/214], respectively), but both decreased over time. There were no differences in the average Campylobacter concentrations shed by cattle (600 CFU g(-1)) and sheep (820 CFU g(-1)), although sheep did show a significant temporal reduction in the number of Campylobacter organisms shed in their feces. A total of 21 different sequence types (STs) (97.7% C. jejuni, 2.3% C. coli) were isolated from cattle, and 9 different STs were isolated from sheep (40.6% C. jejuni, 59.4% C. coli). The Campylobacter population in cattle was relatively stable, and the frequencies of genotypes isolated showed little temporal variation. However, the composition of subtypes isolated from sheep did show significant temporal differences. The cattle and sheep consistently showed significant differences in their carriage of Campylobacter species, STs, and CCs despite the fact that both were exposed to the same farming environment. This work has highlighted the patterns of a Campylobacter population on a ruminant farm by identifying the existence of both temporal and between-host variations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.