ArticleNeuroImage2012
Neural decoding of collective wisdom with multi-brain computing.
Article in NeuroImage, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Collaborative Brain-Computer Interface Framework for Enhancing Group Detection Performance of Dynamic Visual Targets.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Anytime collaborative brain-computer interfaces for enhancing perceptual group decision-making.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Wisdom of crowds benefits perceptual decision making across difficulty levels.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Neurotechnologies for Human Cognitive Augmentation: Current State of the Art and Future Prospects.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Review
- Human Brain/Cloud Interface.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Article
- Group Augmentation in Realistic Visual-Search Decisions via a Hybrid Brain-Computer Interface.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- The wisdom of crowds for visual search.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Towards the automated localisation of targets in rapid image-sifting by collaborative brain-computer interfaces.PloS one · 2017Article
- Computing Arm Movements with a Monkey Brainet.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Collective intelligence meets medical decision-making: the collective outperforms the best radiologist.PloS one · 2015Article
- Correction: cecotti, h. And rivet, B. Subject combination and electrode selection in cooperative brain-computer interface based on event related potentials. Brain sci. 2014, 4, 335-355.Brain sciences · 2014Article
- Subject combination and electrode selection in cooperative brain-computer interface based on event related potentials.Brain sciences · 2014Article
- Article
- Expanding horizons in ergonomics research.NeuroImage · 2012Article
- Modeling collective animal behavior with a cognitive perspective: a methodological framework.PloS one · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Group decisions and even aggregation of multiple opinions lead to greater decision accuracy, a phenomenon known as collective wisdom. Little is known about the neural basis of collective wisdom and whether its benefits arise in late decision stages or in early sensory coding. Here, we use electroencephalography and multi-brain computing with twenty humans making perceptual decisions to show that combining neural activity across brains increases decision accuracy paralleling the improvements shown by aggregating the observers' opinions. Although the largest gains result from an optimal linear combination of neural decision variables across brains, a simpler neural majority decision rule, ubiquitous in human behavior, results in substantial benefits. In contrast, an extreme neural response rule, akin to a group following the most extreme opinion, results in the least improvement with group size. Analyses controlling for number of electrodes and time-points while increasing number of brains demonstrate unique benefits arising from integrating neural activity across different brains. The benefits of multi-brain integration are present in neural activity as early as 200 ms after stimulus presentation in lateral occipital sites and no additional benefits arise in decision related neural activity. Sensory-related neural activity can predict collective choices reached by aggregating individual opinions, voting results, and decision confidence as accurately as neural activity related to decision components. Estimation of the potential for the collective to execute fast decisions by combining information across numerous brains, a strategy prevalent in many animals, shows large time-savings. Together, the findings suggest that for perceptual decisions the neural activity supporting collective wisdom and decisions arises in early sensory stages and that many properties of collective cognition are explainable by the neural coding of information across multiple brains. Finally, our methods highlight the potential of multi-brain computing as a technique to rapidly and in parallel gather increased information about the environment as well as to access collective perceptual/cognitive choices and mental states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21782959What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.