SynthesisThe Lancet. Oncology2011
Height and cancer incidence in the Million Women Study: prospective cohort, and meta-analysis of prospective studies of height and total cancer risk.
Synthesis in The Lancet. Oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 190 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
190 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Anthropometrics, cancer risks, and survival outcomes in adult patients with glioma - a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Body Composition and Risk of Incident Heart Failure in 1 Million Adults: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Pooled it
- Association of childhood and adolescence obesity with incidence and mortality of adulthood cancers. A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Pooled it
- Adult-Attained Height and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Cohort Study, Systematic Review, and Meta-Analysis.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Body mass index and height and risk of cutaneous melanoma: Mendelian randomization analyses.International journal of epidemiology · 2020Pooled it
- Height and body fatness and colorectal cancer risk: an update of the WCRF-AICR systematic review of published prospective studies.European journal of nutrition · 2018Pooled it
- An update of the WCRF/AICR systematic literature review and meta-analysis on dietary and anthropometric factors and esophageal cancer risk.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2017Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Adult height, coronary heart disease and stroke: a multi-locus Mendelian randomization meta-analysis.International journal of epidemiology · 2016Pooled it
- Association between Adult Height and Risk of Colorectal, Lung, and Prostate Cancer: Results from Meta-analyses of Prospective Studies and Mendelian Randomization Analyses.PLoS medicine · 2016Pooled it
- Height and Breast Cancer Risk: Evidence From Prospective Studies and Mendelian Randomization.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2015Pooled it
- Height and kidney cancer risk: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2015Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies of adult height in East Asians identifies 17 novel loci.Human molecular genetics · 2015Pooled it
- Birth weight and adult cancer incidence: large prospective study and meta-analysis.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2014Pooled it
- Adult height and the risk of cause-specific death and vascular morbidity in 1 million people: individual participant meta-analysis.International journal of epidemiology · 2012Pooled it
- Association Between Height and Clinical Outcome in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Enrolled Onto a Randomized Phase 3 Clinical Trial: Data From the FIRE-3 Study.Clinical colorectal cancer · 2018Trial
- Height and bone mineral density are associated with naevus count supporting the importance of growth in melanoma susceptibility.PloS one · 2015Trial
- No genome-wide correlations and little shared genetic architecture between reproductive life-history traits and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer risk.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Global patterns and trends in kidney cancer incidence and mortality.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
130 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEpidemiological studies have shown that taller people are at increased risk of cancer, but it is unclear if height-associated risks vary by cancer site, or by other factors such as smoking and socioeconomic status. Our aim was to investigate these associations in a large UK prospective cohort with sufficient information on incident cancer to allow direct comparison of height-associated risk across cancer sites and in relation to major potential confounding and modifying factors.
methodsInformation on height and other factors relevant for cancer was obtained in 1996-2001 for middle-aged women without previous cancer who were followed up for cancer incidence. We used Cox regression models to calculate adjusted relative risks (RRs) per 10 cm increase in measured height for total incident cancer and for 17 specific cancer sites, taking attained age as the underlying time variable. We also did a meta-analysis of published results from prospective studies of total cancer risk in relation to height.
findings1 297 124 women included in our analysis were followed up for a total of 11·7 million person-years (median 9·4 years per woman, IQR 8·4-10·2), during which time 97 376 incident cancers occurred. The RR for total cancer was of 1·16 (95% CI 1·14-1·17; p<0·0001) for every 10 cm increase in height. Risk increased for 15 of the 17 cancer sites we assessed, and was statistically significant for ten sites: colon (RR per 10 cm increase in height 1·25, 95% CI 1·19-1·30), rectum (1·14, 1·07-1·22), malignant melanoma (1·32, 1·24-1·40), breast (1·17, 1·15-1·19), endometrium (1·19, 1·13-1·24), ovary (1·17, 1·11-1·23), kidney (1·29, 1·19-1·41), CNS (1·20, 1·12-1·29), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (1·21, 1·14-1·29), and leukaemia (1·26, 1·15-1·38). The increase in total cancer RR per 10 cm increase in height did not vary significantly by socioeconomic status or by ten other personal characteristics we assessed, but was significantly lower in current than in never smokers (p<0·0001). In current smokers, smoking-related cancers were not as strongly related to height as were other cancers (RR per 10 cm increase in height 1·05, 95% CI 1·01-1·09, and 1·17, 1·13-1·22, respectively; p=0·0004). In a meta-analysis of our study and ten other prospective studies, height-associated RRs for total cancer showed little variation across Europe, North America, Australasia, and Asia.
interpretationCancer incidence increases with increasing adult height for most cancer sites. The relation between height and total cancer RR is similar in different populations.
fundingCancer Research UK and the UK Medical Research Council.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.