Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21782352›Full record

Trial reportDrug and alcohol dependence2011

Results of a pilot randomized controlled trial of buprenorphine for opioid dependent women in the criminal justice system.

Karen L Cropsey, Peter S Lane, Galen J Hale, Dorothy O Jackson, C Brendan Clark, Karen S Ingersoll, M Aminul Islam, Maxine L Stitzer

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Routes of non-traditional entry into buprenorphine treatment programs.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Interventions for female drug-using offenders.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Pharmacological interventions for drug-using offenders.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. [Therapy of substance use disorders in correctional settings].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karen L CropseyUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Psychiatry, 401 Beacon Parkway West, Birmingham, AL 35209, USA. kcropsey@uab.edu
Peter S Lane
Galen J Hale
Dorothy O Jackson
C Brendan Clark
Karen S Ingersoll
M Aminul Islam
Maxine L Stitzer
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

Development of CART for HIV adherence and cocaine abuseR01DA016554 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI INGERSOLL, KAREN S · 2003 to 2006
$1.5M
Relapse prevention to reduce HIV among women prisonersR21DA019838 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI CROPSEY, KAREN L · 2007 to 2008
$329k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA016554NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA019838NIDA NIH HHS R21DA019838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsRecent studies have demonstrated the efficacy of both methadone and buprenorphine when used with opioid dependent men transitioning from prison to the community, but no studies have been conducted with women in the criminal justice (CJ) system. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of buprenorphine for relapse prevention among opioid dependent women in the CJ system transitioning back to the community.

methods36 women under CJ supervision were recruited from an inpatient drug treatment facility that treats CJ individuals returning back to the community. Nine were enrolled in an open label buprenorphine arm then 27 were randomized to buprenorphine (n=15) or placebo (n=12; double-blind). All women completed baseline measures and started study medication prior to release. Participants were followed weekly, provided urine drug screens (UDS), received study medication for 12 weeks, and returned for a 3-month follow-up. Intent-to-treat analyses were performed for all time points through 3 month follow-up.

resultsThe majority of participants were Caucasian (88.9%), young (M±SD=31.8±8.4 years), divorced/separated (59.2%) women with at least a high school/GED education (M±SD=12±1.7 years). GEE analyses showed that buprenorphine was efficacious in maintaining abstinence across time compared to placebo. At end of treatment, 92% of placebo and 33% of active medication participants were positive for opiates on urine drug screen (Chi-Square=10.9, df=1; p<0.001). However, by the three month follow-up point, no differences were found between the two groups, with 83% of participants at follow-up positive for opiates.

conclusionsWomen in the CJ system who received buprenorphine prior to release from a treatment facility had fewer opiate positive UDS through the 12 weeks of treatment compared to women receiving placebo. Initiating buprenorphine in a controlled environment prior to release appears to be a viable strategy to reduce opiate use when transitioning back to the community.

Indexed as

Criminal LawAdultAlabamaBuprenorphineDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesOpioid-Related DisordersPilot ProjectsSubstance Abuse Treatment CentersYoung AdultBuprenorphine

Identifiers

PMID21782352
PMCPMC3214606
OpenAlexW2147649729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.