Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21780090›Full record

ReviewCancer2011

Assessing the impact of patient navigation: prevention and early detection metrics.

Tracy A Battaglia, Linda Burhansstipanov, Samantha S Murrell, Andrea J Dwyer, Sarah E Caron, Prevention and Early Detection Workgroup, National Patient Navigation Leadership Summit

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Integration of Value Assessment and Social Network Methods for Breast Health Navigation Among African Americans.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2023
    Article
  7. An Evaluation of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Outcomes in an Education and Patient Navigation Program in Rural and Border Texas.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Perspectives from oncology patient navigation programs on information management practices and needs: a descriptive study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Effects of Patient Navigation on Patient Satisfaction Outcomes.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tracy A BattagliaWomen's Health Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. tracy.battaglia@bmc.org
Linda Burhansstipanov
Samantha S Murrell
Andrea J Dwyer
Sarah E Caron
Prevention and Early Detection Workgroup, National Patient Navigation Leadership Summit

Funding

Patient Navigator ProgramU01CA117281 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR &RES INST · PI ROETZHEIM, RICHARD G · 2005 to 2009
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA117281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe lack of comparable metrics to evaluate prevention and early detection patient navigation programs impeded the ability to identify best practices.

methodsThe Prevention and Early Detection Workgroup of the Patient Navigation Leadership Summit was charged with making recommendations for common clinical metrics specific to the prevention and early detection phase of the cancer care continuum. The workgroup began with a review of existing literature to characterize variability in published navigation metrics; then developed a list of priority recommendations that would be applicable to the range of navigation settings (clinical, academic, or community-based).

resultsRecommendations for researchers and program evaluators included the following: 1) Clearly document key program characteristics; 2) Use a set of core data elements to form the basis of your reported metrics; and 3) Prioritize data collection using methods with the least amount of bias.

conclusionsIf navigation programs explicitly state the context of their evaluation and choose from among the common set of data elements, meaningful comparisons among existing programs should be feasible.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerFemaleHealth Care ReformHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMass ScreeningNeoplasmsPractice Guidelines as TopicPrimary PreventionProgram EvaluationRisk AssessmentUnited States

Identifiers

PMID21780090
PMCPMC4560256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.