Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21779949›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2012

Cost implications of ACGME's 2011 changes to resident duty hours and the training environment.

Teryl K Nuckols, José J Escarce

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The effect of reducing maximum shift lengths to 16 hours on internal medicine interns' educational opportunities.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Teryl K NuckolsDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, 911 Broxton Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. tnuckols@mednet.ucla.edu
José J Escarce
RAND Corporation · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

The Value of Hospital-Related Patient-Safety Interventions to Key StakeholdersK08HS017954 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI NUCKOLS, TERYL · 2009 to 2012
$553k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS017954AHRQ HHS K08 HS17954
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn July 2011, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) will implemented stricter duty-hour limits and related changes to the training environment. This may affect preventable adverse event (PAE) rates.

objectivesTo estimate direct costs under various implementation approaches, and examine net costs to teaching hospitals and cost-effectiveness to society across a range of hypothetical changes in PAEs.

designA decision-analytical model represented direct costs and PAE rates, mortality, and costs. DATA SOURCES: Published literature and publicly available data. TARGET POPULATION: Patients admitted to hospitals with ACGME-accredited programs. TIME HORIZON: One year. PERSPECTIVES: All teaching hospitals, major teaching hospitals, society.

interventionACGME's 2011 Common Program Requirements. OUTCOME MEASURES: Direct annual costs (all accredited hospitals), net cost (major teaching hospitals), cost per death averted (society). RESULTS OF BASE-ANALYSIS: Nationwide, duty-hour changes would cost $177 million annually if interns maintain current productivity, vs. up to $982 million if they transfer work to a mixture of substitutes; training-environment changes will cost $204 million. If PAEs decline by 7.2-25.8%, net costs to major teaching hospitals will be zero. If PAEs fall by 3%, the cost to society per death averted would be -$523,000 (95%-confidence interval: -$1.82 million to $685,000) to $2.44 million ($271,000 to $6.91 million). If PAEs rise, the policy will be cost-increasing for teaching hospitals and society. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: The total direct annual cost nationwide would be up to $1.34 billion using nurse practitioners/physician assistants, $1.64 billion using attending physicians, $820 million hiring additional residents, vs. 1.42 billion using mixed substitutes. LIMITATIONS: The effect on PAEs is unknown. Data were limited for some model parameters.

conclusionImplementation decisions greatly affect the cost. Unless PAEs decline substantially, teaching hospitals will lose money. If PAEs decline modestly, the requirements might be cost-saving or cost-effective to society.

Indexed as

AccreditationCosts and Cost AnalysisEducation, Medical, GraduateHospitals, TeachingHumansInternship and ResidencyPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingUnited StatesWork Schedule Tolerance

Identifiers

PMID21779949
PMCPMC3270247
OpenAlexW2043744503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.