ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2012
Cost implications of ACGME's 2011 changes to resident duty hours and the training environment.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Addressing fatigue in medical residents with biomathematical fatigue modeling.Journal of occupational health · 2021Article
- Associations Between In-Hospital Mortality, Health Care Utilization, and Inpatient Costs With the 2011 Resident Duty Hour Revision.Journal of graduate medical education · 2019Article
- Why Residents Quit: National Rates of and Reasons for Attrition Among Emergency Medicine Physicians in Training.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2019Observational
- Article
- On Patient Safety: Have The ACGME Resident Work Hour Reforms Improved Patient Safety?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2015Review
- Observational
- Resident duty hours: a survey of internal medicine program directors.Journal of general internal medicine · 2014Observational
- Impact of 2011 resident duty hour requirements on neurology residency programs and departments.The Neurohospitalist · 2014Article
- Organizational interventions in response to duty hour reforms.BMC medical education · 2014Review
- Teaching hospital financial status and patient outcomes following ACGME duty hour reform.Health services research · 2013Article
- The effect of reducing maximum shift lengths to 16 hours on internal medicine interns' educational opportunities.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2013Article
- Article
- Resident work hours: why keeping the status quo may not be such a bad thing.Canadian medical education journal · 2013Article
- The ACGME's 2011 changes to resident duty hours: are they an unfunded mandate on teaching hospitals?Journal of general internal medicine · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn July 2011, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) will implemented stricter duty-hour limits and related changes to the training environment. This may affect preventable adverse event (PAE) rates.
objectivesTo estimate direct costs under various implementation approaches, and examine net costs to teaching hospitals and cost-effectiveness to society across a range of hypothetical changes in PAEs.
designA decision-analytical model represented direct costs and PAE rates, mortality, and costs. DATA SOURCES: Published literature and publicly available data. TARGET POPULATION: Patients admitted to hospitals with ACGME-accredited programs. TIME HORIZON: One year. PERSPECTIVES: All teaching hospitals, major teaching hospitals, society.
interventionACGME's 2011 Common Program Requirements. OUTCOME MEASURES: Direct annual costs (all accredited hospitals), net cost (major teaching hospitals), cost per death averted (society). RESULTS OF BASE-ANALYSIS: Nationwide, duty-hour changes would cost $177 million annually if interns maintain current productivity, vs. up to $982 million if they transfer work to a mixture of substitutes; training-environment changes will cost $204 million. If PAEs decline by 7.2-25.8%, net costs to major teaching hospitals will be zero. If PAEs fall by 3%, the cost to society per death averted would be -$523,000 (95%-confidence interval: -$1.82 million to $685,000) to $2.44 million ($271,000 to $6.91 million). If PAEs rise, the policy will be cost-increasing for teaching hospitals and society. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: The total direct annual cost nationwide would be up to $1.34 billion using nurse practitioners/physician assistants, $1.64 billion using attending physicians, $820 million hiring additional residents, vs. 1.42 billion using mixed substitutes. LIMITATIONS: The effect on PAEs is unknown. Data were limited for some model parameters.
conclusionImplementation decisions greatly affect the cost. Unless PAEs decline substantially, teaching hospitals will lose money. If PAEs decline modestly, the requirements might be cost-saving or cost-effective to society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.