ArticleThe Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians2009
Measuring Persistence to Oral Hypoglycemic Agents in Type 2 Diabetic Veterans.
Article in The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying Risk of Viral Failure in Treated HIV-Infected Patients Using Different Measures of Adherence: The Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort Collaboration.Journal of clinical medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMedication adherence is essential for diabetes control but difficult to measure. Persistence, the continuous refill of medications, is one measurement that could be integrated into practice, but concordance among definitions of persistence is unclear.
objectiveTo compare persistence patterns in the use of oral hypoglycemic agents by diabetic veterans in the first year of treatment, using 2 separate refill metrics.
methodsEligible veterans were 18 years or older and had filled at least one prescription for any nondiabetes drug during the 6 months preceding study entry. Study entry was the date that patients first filled a prescription for oral hypoglycemic agents between January 1,2000, and December 31, 2002. Persistence was defined as (1) total days (days' supply/study period) and (2) continuous fill (days' supply/refill interval).
resultsInclusion criteria were met by 110,554 veterans. They had a median age of 63 years, 97% were male, and most had multiple comorbidities. Most patients received only one oral hypoglycemic agent. When total days was used, median persistence at 1 year was 83%, with 45% of subjects demonstrating poor persistence (<80%). When continuous fill was used, median persistence was 0.99, and 24% had poor persistence. Both metrics decreased over time. Continuous fill produced higher persistence estimates and a substantial proportion of overpersistence (>24% of patients). The 2 measures had a kappa agreement statistic of 0.56 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.57).
conclusionsAlthough both metrics showed similar trajectories over time, more conservative estimates, ease of calculation, and transparency favor total days over continuous fill. Continuous fill revealed substantial overpersistence, which should be considered separately from good persistence. Explicit definitions of persistence are necessary to enhance comparisons among refill studies and provide context for clinical applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.