Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21779447›Full record

ArticleGenes & cancer2010

DNA demethylating antineoplastic strategies: a comparative point of view.

Stefano Amatori, Irene Bagaloni, Benedetta Donati, Mirco Fanelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. DNA Methyltransferases: From Evolution to Clinical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Global methylation and promoter-specific methylation of theExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2017
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. HEDD: the human epigenetic drug database.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stefano AmatoriMolecular Pathology and Oncology Lab. "PaoLa," Department of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Urbino "Carlo Bo," Fano, Italy.
Irene Bagaloni
Benedetta Donati
Mirco Fanelli

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the involvement of genetic alterations in neoplastic cell transformation, it is increasingly evident that abnormal epigenetic patterns, such as those affecting DNA methylation and histone posttranslational modifications (PTMs), play an essential role in the early stages of tumor development. This finding, together with the evidence that epigenetic changes are reversible, enabled the development of new antineoplastic therapeutic approaches known as epigenetic therapies. Epigenetic modifications are involved in the control of gene expression, and their aberrant distribution is thought to participate in neoplastic transformation by causing the deregulation of crucial cellular pathways. Epigenetic drugs are able to revert the defective gene expression profile of cancer cells and, consequently, reestablish normal molecular pathways. Considering the emerging interest in epigenetic therapeutics, this review focuses on the approaches affecting DNA methylation, evaluates novel strategies and those already approved for clinical use, and compares their therapeutic potential.

Indexed as

5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine5-azacytidineDNA demethylating drugsDNMT inhibitorsepigenetic therapy

Identifiers

PMID21779447
PMCPMC3092190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.