Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21779180›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2011

Proteins in the nutrient-sensing and DNA damage checkpoint pathways cooperate to restrain mitotic progression following DNA damage.

Jennifer S Searle, Matthew D Wood, Mandeep Kaur, David V Tobin, Yolanda Sanchez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. MyC Factor Analogue CO5 Promotes the Growth ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Substrates of the MAPK Slt2: Shaping Yeast Cell Integrity.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Systematic identification of signal integration by protein kinase A.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer S SearleDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Matthew D Wood
Mandeep Kaur
David V Tobin
Yolanda Sanchez
Dartmouth College · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · US

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Steven D Leach · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
REPRODUCTIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICOLOGY RESEARCHP30ES006096 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI YADAV, JAGJIT S · 1992 to 2022
$35.4M
DISSECTION OF THE DNA DAMAGE CHECKPOINT PATHWAYSR01CA084463 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI SANCHEZ, YOLANDA · 2000 to 2009
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NCI NIH HHS R01 CA084463NCI NIH HHS R01 CA84463NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES006096NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES06096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Checkpoint pathways regulate genomic integrity in part by blocking anaphase until all chromosomes have been completely replicated, repaired, and correctly aligned on the spindle. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, DNA damage and mono-oriented or unattached kinetochores trigger checkpoint pathways that bifurcate to regulate both the metaphase to anaphase transition and mitotic exit. The sensor-associated kinase, Mec1, phosphorylates two downstream kinases, Chk1 and Rad53. Activation of Chk1 and Rad53 prevents anaphase and causes inhibition of the mitotic exit network. We have previously shown that the PKA pathway plays a role in blocking securin and Clb2 destruction following DNA damage. Here we show that the Mec1 DNA damage checkpoint regulates phosphorylation of the regulatory (R) subunit of PKA following DNA damage and that the phosphorylated R subunit has a role in restraining mitosis following DNA damage. In addition we found that proteins known to regulate PKA in response to nutrients and stress either by phosphorylation of the R subunit or regulating levels of cAMP are required for the role of PKA in the DNA damage checkpoint. Our data indicate that there is cross-talk between the DNA damage checkpoint and the proteins that integrate nutrient and stress signals to regulate PKA.

Indexed as

DNA DamageFoodMitosisSignal TransductionAnaphaseCyclic AMPCyclic AMP-Dependent Protein KinasesModels, BiologicalMutationPhosphorylationProtein SubunitsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsCyclic AMPCyclic AMP-Dependent Protein KinasesProtein SubunitsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21779180
PMCPMC3136438
OpenAlexW2086639426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.