Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21777981›Full record

ArticleGeneral hospital psychiatry

A brief screening tool for assessing psychological trauma in clinical practice: development and validation of the New York PTSD Risk Score.

Joseph A Boscarino, H Lester Kirchner, Stuart N Hoffman, Jennifer Sartorius, Richard E Adams, Charles R Figley

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in General hospital psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The traumatology of life.The Journal of nervous and mental disease · 2012
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph A BoscarinoCenter for Health Research, Geisinger Clinic, Danville, PA 17822-4400, USA. jaboscarino@geisinger.edu
H Lester Kirchner
Stuart N Hoffman
Jennifer Sartorius
Richard E Adams
Charles R Figley
Geisinger Medical Center · USKent State University · USTemple University · USTulane University · US

Funding

Mental Health Services in NY after WTC DisasterR01MH066403 · NIMH · NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE · PI BOSCARINO, JOSEPH A · 2002 to 2004
$1.6M
Developing PTSD Risk Assessment Tools Using the World Trade Center Outcome StudyR21MH086317 · NIMH · GEISINGER CLINIC · PI BOSCARINO, JOSEPH A · 2009 to 2010
$437k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH066403NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH-66403NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH086317NIMH NIH HHS R21-MH-086317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective was to develop a brief posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) screening instrument that is useful in clinical practice, similar to the Framingham Risk Score used in cardiovascular medicine.

methodsWe used data collected in New York City after the World Trade Center disaster (WTCD) and other trauma data to develop a new PTSD prediction tool--the New York PTSD Risk Score. We used diagnostic test methods to examine different clinical domains, including PTSD symptoms, trauma exposures, sleep disturbances, suicidal thoughts, depression symptoms, demographic factors and other measures to assess different PTSD prediction models.

resultsUsing receiver operating curve (ROC) and bootstrap methods, five prediction domains, including core PTSD symptoms, sleep disturbance, access to care status, depression symptoms and trauma history, and five demographic variables, including gender, age, education, race and ethnicity, were identified. For the best prediction model, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.880 for the Primary Care PTSD Screen alone (specificity=82.2%, sensitivity=93.7%). Adding care status, sleep disturbance, depression and trauma exposure increased the AUC to 0.943 (specificity=85.7%, sensitivity=93.1%), a significant ROC improvement (P<.0001). Adding demographic variables increased the AUC to 0.945, which was not significant (P=.250). To externally validate these models, we applied the WTCD results to 705 pain patients treated at a multispecialty group practice and to 225 trauma patients treated at a Level I Trauma Center. These results validated those from the original WTCD development and validation samples.

conclusionThe New York PTSD Risk Score is a multifactor prediction tool that includes the Primary Care PTSD Screen, depression symptoms, access to care, sleep disturbance, trauma history and demographic variables and appears to be effective in predicting PTSD among patients seen in healthcare settings. This prediction tool is simple to administer and appears to outperform other screening measures.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseDepressive DisorderFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew York CityPainPennsylvaniaPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID21777981
PMCPMC3557518
OpenAlexW1967901558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.