Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21777456›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2011

Public health in community pharmacy: a systematic review of pharmacist and consumer views.

Claire E Eades, Jill S Ferguson, Ronan E O'Carroll

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01860378 (Retail Pharmacy Vouchers to Promote Tdap Vaccination for Adults Living With Infants), which is not on this map. Cited by 192 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
192citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01860378 early_phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Retail Pharmacy Vouchers to Promote Tdap Vaccination for Adults Living With Infants

TypeinterventionalSponsorChildren's Hospital of PhiladelphiaRan2013 to 2015Enrolled149ConditionsWhooping CoughArmsFull price, $5 off
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

192 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 473 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pharmacy-based management for depression in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Community pharmacy personnel interventions for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Patient and public perspectives of community pharmacies in the United Kingdom: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Social Attitudes Towards Public Health Interventions in Community Pharmacies in Poland: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

132 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Claire E EadesDepartment of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK. claire.eades@nhs.net
Jill S Ferguson
Ronan E O'Carroll
University of Stirling · GBNHS Forth Valley · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing involvement of pharmacists in public health will require changes in the behaviour of both pharmacists and the general public. A great deal of research has shown that attitudes and beliefs are important determinants of behaviour. This review aims to examine the beliefs and attitudes of pharmacists and consumers towards pharmaceutical public health in order to inform how best to support and improve this service.

methodsFive electronic databases were searched for articles published in English between 2001 and 2010. Titles and abstracts were screened by one researcher according to the inclusion criteria. Papers were included if they assessed pharmacy staff or consumer attitudes towards pharmaceutical public health. Full papers identified for inclusion were assessed by a second researcher and data were extracted by one researcher.

resultsFrom the 5628 papers identified, 63 studies in 67 papers were included. Pharmacy staff: Most pharmacists viewed public health services as important and part of their role but secondary to medicine related roles. Pharmacists' confidence in providing public health services was on the whole average to low. Time was consistently identified as a barrier to providing public health services. Lack of an adequate counselling space, lack of demand and expectation of a negative reaction from customers were also reported by some pharmacists as barriers. A need for further training was identified in relation to a number of public health services. Consumers: Most pharmacy users had never been offered public health services by their pharmacist and did not expect to be offered. Consumers viewed pharmacists as appropriate providers of public health advice but had mixed views on the pharmacists' ability to do this. Satisfaction was found to be high in those that had experienced pharmaceutical public health

conclusionsThere has been little change in customer and pharmacist attitudes since reviews conducted nearly 10 years previously. In order to improve the public health services provided in community pharmacy, training must aim to increase pharmacists' confidence in providing these services. Confident, well trained pharmacists should be able to offer public health service more proactively which is likely to have a positive impact on customer attitudes and health.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePharmaciesPharmacistsProfessional RolePublic HealthAdolescentAdultDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID21777456
PMCPMC3146877
OpenAlexW2129374379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.