Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21777306›Full record

ReviewJournal of internal medicine2011

Myalgic encephalomyelitis: International Consensus Criteria.

B M Carruthers, M I van de Sande, K L De Meirleir, N G Klimas, G Broderick, T Mitchell, D Staines, A C P Powles, N Speight, R Vallings and 16 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of internal medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03675087 (Assessment of Exercise Response in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome / Myalgic Encephalomyelitis.), which is not on this map. Cited by 668 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
668citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03675087 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of Exercise Response in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome / Myalgic Encephalomyelitis.

TypeobservationalSponsorEscuela Universitaria de Fisioterapia de la OnceRan2019 to 2025Enrolled22ConditionsFatigue Syndrome, Chronic
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

668 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Recent research in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: an evidence map.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Exercise therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

608 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

B M CarruthersDepartment of Physiology and Medicine, Vrije University of Brussels, Himmunitas Foundation, Brussels, Belgium. bcarruth@telus.net
M I van de Sande
K L De Meirleir
N G Klimas
G Broderick
T Mitchell
D Staines
A C P Powles
N Speight
R Vallings
L Bateman
B Baumgarten-Austrheim
D S Bell
N Carlo-Stella
J Chia
A Darragh
D Jo
D Lewis
A R Light
S Marshall-Gradisnik
I Mena
J A Mikovits
K Miwa
M Murovska
M L Pall
S Stevens

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The label 'chronic fatigue syndrome' (CFS) has persisted for many years because of the lack of knowledge of the aetiological agents and the disease process. In view of more recent research and clinical experience that strongly point to widespread inflammation and multisystemic neuropathology, it is more appropriate and correct to use the term 'myalgic encephalomyelitis' (ME) because it indicates an underlying pathophysiology. It is also consistent with the neurological classification of ME in the World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases (ICD G93.3). Consequently, an International Consensus Panel consisting of clinicians, researchers, teaching faculty and an independent patient advocate was formed with the purpose of developing criteria based on current knowledge. Thirteen countries and a wide range of specialties were represented. Collectively, members have approximately 400 years of both clinical and teaching experience, authored hundreds of peer-reviewed publications, diagnosed or treated approximately 50 000 patients with ME, and several members coauthored previous criteria. The expertise and experience of the panel members as well as PubMed and other medical sources were utilized in a progression of suggestions/drafts/reviews/revisions. The authors, free of any sponsoring organization, achieved 100% consensus through a Delphi-type process. The scope of this paper is limited to criteria of ME and their application. Accordingly, the criteria reflect the complex symptomatology. Operational notes enhance clarity and specificity by providing guidance in the expression and interpretation of symptoms. Clinical and research application guidelines promote optimal recognition of ME by primary physicians and other healthcare providers, improve the consistency of diagnoses in adult and paediatric patients internationally and facilitate clearer identification of patients for research studies.

Indexed as

International Classification of DiseasesFatigue Syndrome, ChronicHumans

Identifiers

PMID21777306
PMCPMC3427890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.