Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21776983›Full record

ArticleACS chemical biology2011

Dissecting the functions of conserved prolines within transmembrane helices of the D2 dopamine receptor.

Ethan B Van Arnam, Henry A Lester, Dennis A Dougherty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS chemical biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Conserved proline residues prevent dimerization and aggregation in the β-lactamase BlaC.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Free backbone carbonyls mediate rhodopsin activation.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2016
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Alpha-bulges in G protein-coupled receptors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ethan B Van ArnamDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 91125, United States.
Henry A Lester
Dennis A Dougherty
California Institute of Technology · US

Funding

GPCRs: Chemical-Scale Studies with Unnatural Amino AcidsR01GM081662 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DOUGHERTY, DENNIS A · 2008 to 2011
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM081662NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) contain a number of conserved proline residues in their transmembrane helices, and it is generally assumed these play important functional and/or structural roles. Here we use unnatural amino acid mutagenesis, employing α-hydroxy acids and proline analogues, to examine the functional roles of five proline residues in the transmembrane helices of the D2 dopamine receptor. The well-known tendency of proline to disrupt helical structure is important at all sites, while we find no evidence for a functional role for backbone amide cis-trans isomerization, another feature associated with proline. At most proline sites, the loss of the backbone NH is sufficient to explain the role of the proline. However, at one site, P210(5.50), a substituent on the backbone N appears to be essential for proper function. Interestingly, the pattern in functional consequences that we see is mirrored in the pattern of structural distortions seen in recent GPCR crystal structures.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsConserved SequenceGene ExpressionHumansMutagenesis, Site-DirectedProlineProtein Structure, SecondaryReceptors, Dopamine D2Xenopus laevisProlineReceptors, Dopamine D2

Identifiers

PMID21776983
PMCPMC3199346
OpenAlexW2000697331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.