Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21776328›Full record

ArticleSelf/nonself2011

Kinetic proofreading and the search for nonself-peptides.

Andreas Jansson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Self/nonself, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Biological Pathway Specificity in the Cell-Does Molecular Diversity Matter?BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Receptor-mediated cell mechanosensing.Molecular biology of the cell · 2017
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andreas JanssonSystems Biology Research Centre; School of Life Sciences; University of Skövde; Skövde, Sweden.
University of Skövde · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The T cells scan the surface of antigen-presenting cells with their T cell receptors (TCR) in order to find and respond to specific peptide-major histocompatibility complexes (pMHC). Since mainly self-peptides are expressed on antigen-presenting cells, the T cells must utilize sensitive mechanisms in order to quickly discriminate between self and nonself-peptides. A range of different models have been proposed to account for this process. Due to the experimental inconsistency of how T cells respond to altered peptides it has been difficult to validate the competing models. Recent models, based on the kinetic proofreading model, propose that a short life-time of the TCR/pMHC complexes may be compensated by fast rebinding of the individual molecules. Hence, both the on- and off-rate involved in the interaction between pMHCs and TCRs will determine the fate of the T cell discrimination. I here briefly review some of the proposed models on T cell discrimination and scanning, and discuss the significance of determining self-peptide kinetics to validate the different models.

Identifiers

PMID21776328
PMCPMC3136897
OpenAlexW2094089045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.