ArticleAnesthesiology research and practice2011
Cardiac output assessed by invasive and minimally invasive techniques.
Article in Anesthesiology research and practice, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A recommendation for the use of electrical biosensing technology in neonatology.Pediatric research · 2025Guideline
- Accuracy and Trending Ability of Electrical Biosensing Technology for Non-invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in Neonates: A Systematic Qualitative Review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Pooled it
- Systematic review of cardiac output measurements by echocardiography vs. thermodilution: the techniques are not interchangeable.Intensive care medicine · 2016Pooled it
- The Effective Dose of Remifentanil Combined with Remimazolam in Inhibiting Tracheal Intubation Responses in Elderly Patients: An Up-Down Dose-Finding Study.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in a Collapsed Runner.Journal of acute medicine · 2025Article
- Continuous Monitoring of Advanced Hemodynamic Parameters during Hemodialysis Demonstrated Early Variations in Patients Experiencing Intradialytic Hypotension.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Application of non-invasive bioreactance to assess hemodynamic function in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Physiological reports · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the Hypotensive Preterm Infant: Evidence-Based Practice at the Bedside?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Hemodynamic profiling by critical care echocardiography could be more accurate than invasive techniques and help identify targets for treatment.Scientific reports · 2022Observational
- Competence of Intensivists in Focused Transthoracic Echocardiography in Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Observational Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2018Article
- Comparison of stroke volume measurements during hemodialysis using bioimpedance cardiography and echocardiography.Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis · 2018Article
- Correlation of carotid blood flow and corrected carotid flow time with invasive cardiac output measurements.Critical ultrasound journal · 2017Article
- Non-Invasive Monitoring of Cardiac Output in Critical Care Medicine.Frontiers in medicine · 2017Review
- Validation of stroke volume and cardiac output by electrical interrogation of the brachial artery in normals: assessment of strengths, limitations, and sources of error.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2015Article
- Hemodynamic Monitoring During Heated Intraoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Using the FloTrac/Vigileo System.International surgery · 2015Article
- Newer methods of cardiac output monitoring.World journal of cardiology · 2014Review
- Therapeutic strategies for high-dose vasopressor-dependent shock.Critical care research and practice · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac output (CO) measurement has long been considered essential to the assessment and guidance of therapeutic decisions in critically ill patients and for patients undergoing certain high-risk surgeries. Despite controversies, complications and inherent errors in measurement, pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) continuous and intermittent bolus techniques of CO measurement continue to be the gold standard. Newer techniques provide less invasive alternatives; however, currently available monitors are unable to provide central circulation pressures or true mixed venous saturations. Esophageal Doppler and pulse contour monitors can predict fluid responsiveness and have been shown to decrease postoperative morbidity. Many minimally invasive techniques continue to suffer from decreased accuracy and reliability under periods of hemodynamic instability, and so few have reached the level of interchangeability with the PAC.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.