Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21775962›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2011

Mouse bladder wall injection.

Chi-Ling Fu, Charity A Apelo, Baldemar Torres, Kim H Thai, Michael H Hsieh

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Development of Urinary Bladder Pre-Neoplasia byThe Korean journal of parasitology · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Macrophages are required for host survival in experimental urogenital schistosomiasis.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Bio-protocol · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chi-Ling FuDepartment of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicin, USA.
Charity A Apelo
Baldemar Torres
Kim H Thai
Michael H Hsieh

Funding

Estrogenic Modulation of Genitourinary Epithelial-Probiotic Cross-TalkK08DK087895 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HSIEH, MICHAEL HARRISON · 2010 to 2014
$902k
NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK087895NIDDK NIH HHS K08DK087895-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mouse bladder wall injection is a useful technique to orthotopically study bladder phenomena, including stem cell, smooth muscle, and cancer biology. Before starting injections, the surgical area must be cleaned with soap and water and antiseptic solution. Surgical equipment must be sterilized before use and between each animal. Each mouse is placed under inhaled isoflurane anesthesia (2-5% for induction, 1-3% for maintenance) and its bladder exposed by making a midline abdominal incision with scissors. If the bladder is full, it is partially decompressed by gentle squeezing between two fingers. The cell suspension of interest is intramurally injected into the wall of the bladder dome using a 29 or 30 gauge needle and 1 cc or smaller syringe. The wound is then closed using wound clips and the mouse allowed to recover on a warming pad. Bladder wall injection is a delicate microsurgical technique that can be mastered with practice.

Indexed as

AnimalsInjectionsMiceMicrosurgeryUrinary Bladder

Identifiers

PMID21775962
PMCPMC3196188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.