Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21775734›Full record

ArticleNeurology2011

Cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying therapy for multiple sclerosis: a population-based study.

K Noyes, A Bajorska, A Chappel, S R Schwid, L R Mehta, B Weinstock-Guttman, R G Holloway, A W Dick

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Does the inclusion of societal costs change the economic evaluations recommendations? A systematic review for multiple sclerosis disease.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guidelines on the clinical use for the detection of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) to IFN beta in multiple sclerosis therapy: report from the Italian Multiple Sclerosis Study group.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2014
    Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K NoyesDepartment of Community and Preventive Medicine, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Ave., Box 644, Rochester, NY 14620, USA. katia_noyes@urmc.rochester.edu
A Bajorska
A Chappel
S R Schwid
L R Mehta
B Weinstock-Guttman
R G Holloway
A W Dick
Jacobs Institute · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER'S RESEARCH ASSOCIATE ORGANIZATIONUL1RR024160 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI PEARSON, THOMAS ARTHUR · 2006 to 2011
$38.7M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in the United States compared to basic supportive therapy without DMT for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS).

methodsUsing data from a longitudinal MS survey, we generated 10-year disease progression paths for an MS cohort. We used first-order annual Markov models to estimate transitional probabilities. Costs associated with losses of employment were obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Medical costs were estimated using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reimbursement rates and other sources. Outcomes were measured as gains in quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and relapse-free years. Monte Carlo simulations, resampling methods, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate model uncertainty.

resultsUsing DMT for 10 years resulted in modest health gains for all DMTs compared to treatment without DMT (0.082 QALY or <1 quality-adjusted month gain for glatiramer acetate, and 0.126-0.192 QALY gain for interferons). The cost-effectiveness of all DMTs far exceeded $800,000/QALY. Reducing the cost of DMTs had by far the greatest impact on the cost-effectiveness of these treatments (e.g., cost reduction by 67% would improve the probability of Avonex being cost-effective at $164,000/QALY to 50%). Compared to treating patients with all levels of disease, starting DMT earlier was associated with a lower (more favorable) incremental cost-effectiveness ratio compared to initiating treatment at any disease state.

conclusionUse of DMT in MS results in health gains that come at a very high cost.

Indexed as

AdultCohort StudiesCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMarkov ChainsModels, EconomicMonte Carlo MethodMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingQuality-Adjusted Life YearsImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID21775734
PMCPMC3140799
OpenAlexW2013610409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.