Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21775715›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2011

Modulation of inhibitory strength and kinetics facilitates regulation of persistent inward currents and motoneuron excitability following spinal cord injury.

Sharmila Venugopal, Thomas M Hamm, Sharon M Crook, Ranu Jung

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Spinal Cord Injury and Loss of Cortical Inhibition.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Circuit-Specific Early Impairment of Proprioceptive Sensory Neurons in the SOD1The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sharmila VenugopalCenter for Adaptive Neural Systems, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Thomas M Hamm
Sharon M Crook
Ranu Jung
Arizona State University · USSt. Joseph's Hospital · US

Funding

CRCNS: Modeling Neuromusculoskeletal Alterations after Spinal Cord InjuryR01NS054282 · NINDS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI JUNG, RANU · 2005 to 2008
$1.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS054282NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS054282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spasticity is commonly observed after chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) and many other central nervous system disorders (e.g., multiple sclerosis, stroke). SCI-induced spasticity has been associated with motoneuron hyperexcitability partly due to enhanced activation of intrinsic persistent inward currents (PICs). Disrupted spinal inhibitory mechanisms also have been implicated. Altered inhibition can result from complex changes in the strength, kinetics, and reversal potential (E(Cl(-))) of γ-aminobutyric acid A (GABA(A)) and glycine receptor currents. Development of optimal therapeutic strategies requires an understanding of the impact of these interacting factors on motoneuron excitability. We employed computational methods to study the effects of conductance, kinetics, and E(Cl(-)) of a dendritic inhibition on PIC activation and motoneuron discharge. A two-compartment motoneuron with enhanced PICs characteristic of SCI and receiving recurrent inhibition from Renshaw cells was utilized in these simulations. This dendritic inhibition regulated PIC onset and offset and exerted its strongest effects at motoneuron recruitment and in the secondary range of the current-frequency relationship during PIC activation. Increasing inhibitory conductance compensated for moderate depolarizing shifts in E(Cl(-)) by limiting PIC activation and self-sustained firing. Furthermore, GABA(A) currents exerted greater control on PIC activation than glycinergic currents, an effect attributable to their slower kinetics. These results suggest that modulation of the strength and kinetics of GABA(A) currents could provide treatment strategies for uncontrollable spasms.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsDendritesGABAergic NeuronsHumansKineticsMembrane PotentialsMotor NeuronsMuscle SpasticityNeural InhibitionReceptors, GABA-AReceptors, GlycineReflex, AbnormalSpinal Cord InjuriesSynapsesReceptors, GABA-AReceptors, Glycine

Identifiers

PMID21775715
PMCPMC3214109
OpenAlexW2024818405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.