Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21775605›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2011

Effect of sniffing on the temporal structure of mitral/tufted cell output from the olfactory bulb.

Ryan M Carey, Matt Wachowiak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Design Principles From Natural Olfaction for Electronic Noses.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Disinhibitory Circuitry Gates Associative Synaptic Plasticity in Olfactory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Dynamic Impairment of Olfactory Behavior and Signaling Mediated by an Olfactory Corticofugal System.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. CCKergic Tufted Cells Differentially Drive Two Anatomically Segregated Inhibitory Circuits in the Mouse Olfactory Bulb.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ryan M CareyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Matt Wachowiak

Funding

Dynamics of Glomerular Coding in the Olfactory BulbR01DC006441 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI WACHOWIAK, DALE M · 2004 to 2018
$4.9M
CRCNS: Active Sensing and Odor Processing in the Olfactory BulbR01DC011423 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI WACHOWIAK, DALE M · 2010 to 2012
$828k
Processing of temporally dynamic olfactory inputsF31DC010312 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI CAREY, RYAN M · 2010 to 2011
$57k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC010312NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006441NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011423NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC06441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural activity underlying odor representations in the mammalian olfactory system is strongly patterned by respiratory behavior. These dynamics are central to many models of olfactory information processing. We have found previously that sensory inputs to the olfactory bulb change both their magnitude and temporal structure as a function of sniff frequency. Here, we ask how sniff frequency affects responses of mitral/tufted (MT) cells--the principal olfactory bulb output neurons. We recorded from MT cells in anesthetized rats while reproducing sniffs recorded previously from awake animals and varying sniff frequency. The dynamics of a sniff-evoked response were consistent from sniff to sniff but varied across cells. Compared to the dynamics of receptor neuron activation by the same sniffs, the MT response was shorter and faster, reflecting a temporal sharpening of sensory inputs. Increasing sniff frequency led to moderate attenuation of MT response magnitude and significant changes in the temporal structure of the sniff-evoked MT cell response. Most MT cells responded with a shorter duration and shorter rise-time spike burst as sniff frequency increased, reflecting increased temporal sharpening of inputs by the olfactory bulb. These temporal changes were necessary and sufficient to maintain respiratory modulation in the MT cell population across the range of sniff frequencies expressed during behavior. These results suggest that the input-output relationship in the olfactory bulb varies dynamically as a function of sniff frequency and that one function of the postsynaptic network is to maintain robust temporal encoding of odor information across different odor sampling strategies.

Indexed as

SmellAction PotentialsAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsFemaleNerve NetNeural InhibitionNeuronsNonlinear DynamicsOdorantsOlfactory BulbOlfactory PathwaysPresynaptic TerminalsRatsRats, Long-EvansReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID21775605
PMCPMC3159407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.