Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21775590›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2011

Endogenous patterns of activity are required for the maturation of a motor network.

Sarah J Crisp, Jan Felix Evers, Michael Bate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Critical periods inFrontiers in physiology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. TheFrontiers in neural circuits · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah J CrispDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, United Kingdom. sjc85@cam.ac.uk
Jan Felix Evers
Michael Bate

Funding

Wellcome Trust 075934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many parts of the nervous system become active before development is complete, including the embryonic spinal cord. Remarkably, although the subject has been debated for over a century (Harrison, 1904), it is still unclear whether such activity is required for normal development of motor circuitry. In Drosophila, embryonic motor output is initially poorly organized, and coordinated crawling-like behavior gradually emerges over the subsequent phase of development. We show that reversibly blocking synaptic transmission during this phase severely delays the first appearance of coordinated movements. When we interfere with the pattern of neuronal firing during this period, coordination is also delayed or blocked. We conclude that there is a period during which endogenous patterns of neuronal activity are required for the normal development of motor circuits in Drosophila.

Indexed as

Afferent PathwaysAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBody PatterningDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEmbryo, NonmammalianFemaleFunctional LateralityGreen Fluorescent ProteinsMaleMotor ActivityMovementMuscle ContractionPhotic StimulationDrosophila ProteinsGreen Fluorescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21775590
PMCPMC3492740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.