Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21775514›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2011

Antibody profiling of Borrelia burgdorferi infection in horses.

Peter D Burbelo, Kathleen E Bren, Kathryn H Ching, Adam Coleman, Xiuli Yang, Toru Kariu, Michael J Iadarola, Utpal Pal

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antibodies againstMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peter D BurbeloNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. burbelop@nidcr.nih.gov
Kathleen E Bren
Kathryn H Ching
Adam Coleman
Xiuli Yang
Toru Kariu
Michael J Iadarola
Utpal Pal
University of Maryland, College Park · USNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

BORRELIA GENE PRODUCTS CRITICAL FOR NATURAL INFECTION CYCLER01AI080615 · NIAID · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI PAL, UTPAL · 2009 to 2024
$5.2M
Mechanisms of Pain and Immune ProcessesZIADE000724 · NIDCR · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH · PI IADAROLA, MICHAEL J. · 2009 to 2012
$2.6M
Borella Gene Products Critical For Natural Infection CycleR56AI080615 · NIAID · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI PAL, UTPAL · 2013 to 2013
$357k
Molecular trigger of Lyme arthritisR03AR055323 · NIAMS · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI PAL, UTPAL · 2007 to 2009
$222k
NIAID NIH HHS AI080615NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI080615NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI080615NIAMS NIH HHS AR055323NIAMS NIH HHS R03 AR055323
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infection with Borrelia burgdorferi is common in horses and ponies from the New England and mid-Atlantic regions of the United States. Here, we evaluated luciferase immunoprecipitation systems (LIPS) for profiling antibody responses against three different antigenic targets for the diagnosis of equine B. burgdorferi infection. LIPS testing of horse serum samples suspected of Lyme infection revealed that approximately 75% of the horse samples (114/159) were seropositive against the synthetic VOVO antigen, comprising repeated immunodominant C6 epitopes as well as OspC immunodominant epitopes. A comparison of VOVO and immunofluorescence assays (IFA) showed that 51% of the samples were positive in both assays (VOVO(+)/IFA(+)), 13% were VOVO(-)/IFA(+), 21% were VOVO(+)/IFA(-), and 15% were negative in both. To further understand humoral responses to B. burgdorferi and reconcile the diagnostic differences between IFA and VOVO, two additional B. burgdorferi LIPS tests were performed with DbpA and DbpB. Robust seropositive antibody responses against DbpA and/or DbpB were detected in 98% (79/81) of the VOVO(+)/IFA(+) and 93% (50/54) of the discrepant samples. Additionally, some of the samples negative by both VOVO and IFA showed immunoreactivity against DbpA and/or DbpB. Overall, 94% of the suspected horse samples were seropositive by LIPS, and heat map analysis revealed that seropositive samples often were immunoreactive with at least two of the three antigens. These results suggest that LIPS tests employing multiple recombinant antigens offer a promising approach for the evaluation of antibody responses in Lyme disease.

Indexed as

Adhesins, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsRecombinant ProteinsAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialBorrelia burgdorferiFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHorse DiseasesHorsesImmunoprecipitationLuciferasesLyme DiseaseAdhesins, BacterialAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsDdpA protein, Borrelia burgdorferiDdpB protein, Borrelia burgdorferiLuciferasesRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21775514
PMCPMC3165210
OpenAlexW2129160812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.