Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21775439›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2011

Regulation of catch bonds by rate of force application.

Krishna K Sarangapani, Jin Qian, Wei Chen, Veronika I Zarnitsyna, Padmaja Mehta, Tadayuki Yago, Rodger P McEver, Cheng Zhu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. What's the Catch? The Significance of Catch Bonds in T Cell Activation.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Single-molecule investigations of T-cell activation.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2019
    Article
  8. Dynamic bonds and their roles in mechanosensing.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Mechanical forces in the immune system.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Stiff substrates enhance monocytic cell capture through E-selectin but not P-selectin.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Krishna K SarangapaniCoulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA.
Jin Qian
Wei Chen
Veronika I Zarnitsyna
Padmaja Mehta
Tadayuki Yago
Rodger P McEver
Cheng Zhu
Georgia Institute of Technology · USOklahoma Medical Research Foundation · US

Funding

Mechanical Regulation of Selectin-Ligand Binding KineticsR01AI077343 · NIAID · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MCEVER, RODGER PAUL, ZHU, CHENG · 2010 to 2014
$2.5M
Mechanisms for Blood Cell Adhesion Under FlowR01HL090923 · NHLBI · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI MCEVER, RODGER PAUL · 2008 to 2012
$2.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL090923NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL090923NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI077343NIAID NIH HHS R01AI077343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current paradigm for receptor-ligand dissociation kinetics assumes off-rates as functions of instantaneous force without impact from its prior history. This a priori assumption is the foundation for predicting dissociation from a given initial state using kinetic equations. Here we have invalidated this assumption by demonstrating the impact of force history with single-bond kinetic experiments involving selectins and their ligands that mediate leukocyte tethering and rolling on vascular surfaces during inflammation. Dissociation of bonds between L-selectin and P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1) loaded at a constant ramp rate to a constant hold force behaved as catch-slip bonds at low ramp rates that transformed to slip-only bonds at high ramp rates. Strikingly, bonds between L-selectin and 6-sulfo-sialyl Lewis X were impervious to ramp rate changes. This ligand-specific force history effect resembled the effect of a point mutation at the L-selectin surface (L-selectinA108H) predicted to contact the former but not the latter ligand, suggesting that the high ramp rate induced similar structural changes as the mutation. Although the A108H substitution in L-selectin eliminated the ramp rate responsiveness of its dissociation from PSGL-1, the inverse mutation H108A in P-selectin acquired the ramp rate responsiveness. Our data are well explained by the sliding-rebinding model for catch-slip bonds extended to incorporate the additional force history dependence, with Ala-108 playing a pivotal role in this structural mechanism. These results call for a paradigm shift in modeling the mechanical regulation of receptor-ligand bond dissociation, which includes conformational coupling between binding pocket and remote regions of the interacting molecules.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalAmino Acid SubstitutionHumansLewis X AntigenL-SelectinMembrane GlycoproteinsMutation, MissenseProtein BindingStructure-Activity RelationshipLewis X AntigenL-SelectinMembrane GlycoproteinsP-selectin ligand protein

Identifiers

PMID21775439
PMCPMC3173187
OpenAlexW2022601640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.