Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21773714›Full record

Trial reportClinical rheumatology2012

Comparable efficacy of standardized Ayurveda formulation and hydroxychloroquine sulfate (HCQS) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA): a randomized investigator-blind controlled study.

Arvind Chopra, Manjit Saluja, Girish Tillu, Anuradha Venugopalan, Gumdal Narsimulu, Rohini Handa, Lata Bichile, Ashwinikumar Raut, Sanjeev Sarmukaddam, Bhushan Patwardhan

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical rheumatology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Heliyon · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Rheumatology science and practice in India.Rheumatology international · 2018
    Review
  13. The effects of conventional drugs in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis on the serum lipids.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2018
    Article
  14. Genus Tinospora: Ethnopharmacology, Phytochemistry, and Pharmacology.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2016
    Review
  15. Rheumatology in India--quo vadis?Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2015
    Review
  16. Ayurvedic medicine for rheumatoid arthritis.Current rheumatology reports · 2014
    Review
  17. Herbal medicine for rheumatic diseases: promises kept?Current rheumatology reports · 2012
    Review
  18. Tinospora cordifolia: One plant, many roles.Ancient science of life · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Arvind ChopraCentre for Rheumatic Diseases (CRD), 1988 Convent Street, Hermes Elegance, Camp, Pune, 411001, India. crdp@vsnl.net
Manjit Saluja
Girish Tillu
Anuradha Venugopalan
Gumdal Narsimulu
Rohini Handa
Lata Bichile
Ashwinikumar Raut
Sanjeev Sarmukaddam
Bhushan Patwardhan
Institute for Rheumatic Diseases (Japan) · JPSavitribai Phule Pune University · INSun Pharma Advanced Research (India) · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INNizam's Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydroxychloroquine sulfate (HCQS) is a popular disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) despite modest efficacy and toxicity. Ayurveda (ancient India medicinal system) physicians treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with allegedly safer herbal formulations. We report a head-to-head comparison in an exploratory drug trial. The objective is to compare standardized Ayurvedic formulations and HCQS in the treatment of RA. One hundred twenty-one patients with active moderately severe RA (ACR 1988 classified) were randomized into a 24-week investigator-blind, parallel efficacy, three-arm (two Ayurvedic and HCQS) multicenter drug trial study; polyherb (Tinospora cordifolia and Zingiber officinale based) and monoherb (Semecarpus anacardium). Study measures included joint counts (pain/tenderness and swelling), pain visual analogue scale, global disease assessments, and health assessment questionnaire. Oral meloxicam (fixed-dosage schedule) was prescribed to all patients during the initial 16 weeks. Patients on prednisolone could continue a fixed stable dose (<7.5 mg daily). Rescue oral use of paracetamol was permitted and monitored. All groups matched well at baseline. An intent-to-treat analysis (ANOVA, significance P < 0.05) did not show significant differences by treatment groups. In the polyherb, monoherb, and HCQS arms, 44%, 36%, and 51%, respectively, showed ACR 20 index improvement. Several efficacy measures improved significantly in the HCQS and polyherb groups with no difference between the groups (corrected P). However, the latter was individually superior to monoherb. Only mild adverse events (gut and skin, and none withdrew) were reported with no differences between the groups. Forty-two patients dropped out. This preliminary drug trial controlled for HCQS demonstrated a standardized Ayurvedic polyherb drug to be effective and safe in controlling active RA. A better-designed study with a longer evaluation period is recommended.

Indexed as

Medicine, AyurvedicPhytotherapyAdultAgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidFemaleHumansHydroxychloroquineIndiaMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPlant ExtractsSemecarpusSingle-Blind MethodAntirheumatic AgentsHydroxychloroquinePlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID21773714
OpenAlexW1979625554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.