Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21772278›Full record

ReviewNature immunology2011

Crosstalk in NF-κB signaling pathways.

Andrea Oeckinghaus, Matthew S Hayden, Sankar Ghosh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature immunology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,060 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,060citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,060 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Bandgap-Engineered PtAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  11. Differential Effects of a First-in-Class IKKCalcified tissue international · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Role of aging‑related cytokines in neurodegenerative disease (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

1,000 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrea OeckinghausDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, Columbia University, College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.
Matthew S Hayden
Sankar Ghosh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NF-κB transcription factors are critical regulators of immunity, stress responses, apoptosis and differentiation. A variety of stimuli coalesce on NF-κB activation, which can in turn mediate varied transcriptional programs. Consequently, NF-κB-dependent transcription is not only tightly controlled by positive and negative regulatory mechanisms but also closely coordinated with other signaling pathways. This intricate crosstalk is crucial to shaping the diverse biological functions of NF-κB into cell type- and context-specific responses.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CommunicationHumansNF-kappa BSignal TransductionTranscriptional ActivationNF-kappa B

Identifiers

PMID21772278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.