ArticleJAMA2011
Accuracy of stated energy contents of restaurant foods.
Article in JAMA, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Calorie (energy) labelling for changing selection and consumption of food or alcohol.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- AI-based digital image dietary assessment methods compared to humans and ground truth: a systematic review.Annals of medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Barriers and facilitators to implementation of menu labelling interventions from a food service industry perspective: a mixed methods systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2020Pooled it
- Physical activity equivalent labeling vs. calorie labeling: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2018Pooled it
- Calorie menu labeling on quick-service restaurant menus: an updated systematic review of the literature.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2011Pooled it
- The impact of a community social marketing campaign on children's meal orders and consumption: main outcomes from a group randomised controlled trial.Public health nutrition · 2023Trial
- Accuracy of menu calorie labelling in the England out-of-home food sector during 2024: assessment of a national food policy.The British journal of nutrition · 2025Article
- Article
- Changes in energy content of menu items at out-of-home food outlets in England after calorie labelling policy implementation: a pre-post analysis (2021-2022).BMJ public health · 2025Article
- Characterization and shelf life of synbiotic drink powder from porang (Journal of food science and technology · 2024Article
- Preparation procedures of food and beverage samples for oxygen bomb calorimetry: A scoping review and reporting checklist.Journal of food and drug analysis · 2023Article
- Factors Influencing Fidelity to a Calorie Posting Policy in Public Hospitals: A Mixed Methods Study.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Differences in the sugar content of fast-food products across three countries.Public health nutrition · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- A bit or a lot on the side? Observational study of the energy content of starters, sides and desserts in major UK restaurant chains.BMJ open · 2019Observational
- Article
- (Over)eating out at major UK restaurant chains: observational study of energy content of main meals.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2018Observational
- Measured energy content of frequently purchased restaurant meals: multi-country cross sectional study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2018Article
- Changes in the nutritional quality of fast-food items marketed at restaurants, 2010 v. 2013.Public health nutrition · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextNational recommendations for the prevention and treatment of obesity emphasize reducing energy intake. Foods purchased in restaurants provide approximately 35% of the daily energy intake in US individuals but the accuracy of the energy contents listed for these foods is unknown.
objectiveTo examine the accuracy of stated energy contents of foods purchased in restaurants. DESIGN AND
settingA validated bomb calorimetry technique was used to measure dietary energy in food from 42 restaurants, comprising 269 total food items and 242 unique foods. The restaurants and foods were randomly selected from quick-serve and sit-down restaurants in Massachusetts, Arkansas, and Indiana between January and June 2010.
main outcome measureThe difference between restaurant-stated and laboratory-measured energy contents, which were corrected for standard metabolizable energy conversion factors.
resultsThe absolute stated energy contents were not significantly different from the absolute measured energy contents overall (difference of 10 kcal/portion; 95% confidence interval [CI], -15 to 34 kcal/portion; P = .52); however, the stated energy contents of individual foods were variable relative to the measured energy contents. Of the 269 food items, 50 (19%) contained measured energy contents of at least 100 kcal/portion more than the stated energy contents. Of the 10% of foods with the highest excess energy in the initial sampling, 13 of 17 were available for a second sampling. In the first analysis, these foods contained average measured energy contents of 289 kcal/portion (95% CI, 186 to 392 kcal/portion) more than the stated energy contents; in the second analysis, these foods contained average measured energy contents of 258 kcal/portion (95% CI, 154 to 361 kcal/portion) more than the stated energy contents (P <.001 for each vs 0 kcal/portion difference). In addition, foods with lower stated energy contents contained higher measured energy contents than stated, while foods with higher stated energy contents contained lower measured energy contents (P <.001).
conclusionsStated energy contents of restaurant foods were accurate overall. However, there was substantial inaccuracy for some individual foods, with understated energy contents for those with lower energy contents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.