Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21771989›Full record

ArticleJAMA2011

Accuracy of stated energy contents of restaurant foods.

Lorien E Urban, Megan A McCrory, Gerard E Dallal, Sai Krupa Das, Edward Saltzman, Judith L Weber, Susan B Roberts

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Physical activity equivalent labeling vs. calorie labeling: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Calorie menu labeling on quick-service restaurant menus: an updated systematic review of the literature.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2011
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lorien E UrbanJean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, 711 Washington St, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Megan A McCrory
Gerard E Dallal
Sai Krupa Das
Edward Saltzman
Judith L Weber
Susan B Roberts

Funding

Nutrition &Cardiovascular Disease Training ProgramT32HL069772 · NHLBI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI LICHTENSTEIN, ALICE H · 2003 to 2017
$2.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL069772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextNational recommendations for the prevention and treatment of obesity emphasize reducing energy intake. Foods purchased in restaurants provide approximately 35% of the daily energy intake in US individuals but the accuracy of the energy contents listed for these foods is unknown.

objectiveTo examine the accuracy of stated energy contents of foods purchased in restaurants. DESIGN AND

settingA validated bomb calorimetry technique was used to measure dietary energy in food from 42 restaurants, comprising 269 total food items and 242 unique foods. The restaurants and foods were randomly selected from quick-serve and sit-down restaurants in Massachusetts, Arkansas, and Indiana between January and June 2010.

main outcome measureThe difference between restaurant-stated and laboratory-measured energy contents, which were corrected for standard metabolizable energy conversion factors.

resultsThe absolute stated energy contents were not significantly different from the absolute measured energy contents overall (difference of 10 kcal/portion; 95% confidence interval [CI], -15 to 34 kcal/portion; P = .52); however, the stated energy contents of individual foods were variable relative to the measured energy contents. Of the 269 food items, 50 (19%) contained measured energy contents of at least 100 kcal/portion more than the stated energy contents. Of the 10% of foods with the highest excess energy in the initial sampling, 13 of 17 were available for a second sampling. In the first analysis, these foods contained average measured energy contents of 289 kcal/portion (95% CI, 186 to 392 kcal/portion) more than the stated energy contents; in the second analysis, these foods contained average measured energy contents of 258 kcal/portion (95% CI, 154 to 361 kcal/portion) more than the stated energy contents (P <.001 for each vs 0 kcal/portion difference). In addition, foods with lower stated energy contents contained higher measured energy contents than stated, while foods with higher stated energy contents contained lower measured energy contents (P <.001).

conclusionsStated energy contents of restaurant foods were accurate overall. However, there was substantial inaccuracy for some individual foods, with understated energy contents for those with lower energy contents.

Indexed as

Energy IntakeFood AnalysisFood LabelingLegislation, FoodArkansasCalorimetryDietDisclosureFoodHumansIndianaMassachusettsObesityQuality ControlReproducibility of ResultsRestaurants

Identifiers

PMID21771989
PMCPMC4363942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.