Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21771722›Full record

Trial reportCarcinogenesis2011

Repeat polymorphisms in estrogen metabolism genes and prostate cancer risk: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.

Li Tang, Song Yao, Cathee Till, Phyllis J Goodman, Catherine M Tangen, Yue Wu, Alan R Kristal, Elizabeth A Platz, Marian L Neuhouser, Frank Z Stanczyk and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Carcinogenesis, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Molecular basis for prostate cancer racial disparities.Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition) · 2017
    Review
  7. Article
  8. BPH and prostate cancer risk.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Li TangDepartment of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA. li.tang@roswellpark.org
Song Yao
Cathee Till
Phyllis J Goodman
Catherine M Tangen
Yue Wu
Alan R Kristal
Elizabeth A Platz
Marian L Neuhouser
Frank Z Stanczyk
Juergen K V Reichardt
Regina M Santella
Ann Hsing
Ashraful Hoque
Scott M Lippman
Ian M Thompson
Christine B Ambrosone
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USColumbia University · USJames Cook University · AUJohns Hopkins University · USNational Institutes of Health · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Oxidative Damage and DNA Repair in the PCPTP01CA108964 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LIPPMAN, SCOTT M · 2005 to 2009
$13.6M
Nutrigenetics of cruciferous vegetable intake and breast cancer prognosisK07CA148888 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI TANG, LI · 2011 to 2015
$662k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA148888NCI NIH HHS P01 CA108964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The etiology of prostate cancer remains elusive, although steroid hormones probably play a role. Considering the carcinogenic potential of estrogen metabolites as well as altered intraprostatic estrogen biosynthesis during the development of prostate cancer, we investigated associations between repeat polymorphisms of three key estrogen-related genes (CYP11A1, CYP19A1, UGT1A1) and risk of prostate cancer in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT), designed to test finasteride versus placebo as a chemoprevention agent. Using data and specimens from 1154 cases and 1351 controls who were frequency matched on age, family history of prostate cancer and PCPT treatment arm, we used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) separately in the placebo and finasteride arms. Among men in the placebo arm, CYP19A1 7/8 genotype carriers had a significantly higher risk of prostate cancer compared with those with the 7/7 genotype (OR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.16-2.5), regardless of Gleason grade. This genotype was also associated with elevated serum estrogen levels. For the (TA)(n) repeat polymorphism in UGT1A1, the heterozygous short (<7 repeats)/long (≥7 repeats) genotype was significantly associated with the risk of low-grade prostate cancer (OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.05-1.70) compared with the short/short genotype. No significant association was found with CYP11A1. These associations were not observed among men in the finasteride arm. The results indicate that repeat polymorphisms in genes involved in estrogen biosynthesis and metabolism may influence risk of prostate cancer but that their effects may be modified by factors altering hormone metabolism, such as finasteride treatment.

Indexed as

AromataseCase-Control StudiesCholesterol Side-Chain Cleavage EnzymeDNAEstradiolEstrogensEstroneGlucuronosyltransferaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, GeneticProstateProstatic NeoplasmsRadioimmunoassayAromataseCholesterol Side-Chain Cleavage EnzymeCYP19A1 protein, humanDNAEstradiolEstrogensEstroneGlucuronosyltransferaseTestosteroneUGT1A1 Enzyme

Identifiers

PMID21771722
PMCPMC3179424
OpenAlexW2102461030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.