Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21771717›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2012

Chimeric genes as a source of rapid evolution in Drosophila melanogaster.

Rebekah L Rogers, Daniel L Hartl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evolutionary innovation through fusion of sequences from across the tree of life.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. TheFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebekah L RogersDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, USA. rogersrl@uci.edu
Daniel L Hartl
Harvard University · USRogers (United States) · US

Funding

Evolution of Genome IncompatibilitiesR01GM065169 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI HARTL, DANIEL L · 2003 to 2011
$2.5M
Novel genomic effects of Y-linked polymorphismsR01GM084236 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI HARTL, DANIEL L · 2009 to 2012
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM084236NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065169NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM065169NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric genes form through the combination of portions of existing coding sequences to create a new open reading frame. These new genes can create novel protein structures that are likely to serve as a strong source of novelty upon which selection can act. We have identified 14 chimeric genes that formed through DNA-level mutations in Drosophila melanogaster, and we investigate expression profiles, domain structures, and population genetics for each of these genes to examine their potential to effect adaptive evolution. We find that chimeric gene formation commonly produces mid-domain breaks and unites portions of wholly unrelated peptides, creating novel protein structures that are entirely distinct from other constructs in the genome. These new genes are often involved in selective sweeps. We further find a disparity between chimeric genes that have recently formed and swept to fixation versus chimeric genes that have been preserved over long periods of time, suggesting that preservation and adaptation are distinct processes. Finally, we demonstrate that chimeric gene formation can produce qualitative expression changes that are difficult to mimic through duplicate gene formation, and that extremely young chimeric genes (d(S) < 0.03) are more likely to be associated with selective sweeps than duplicate genes of the same age. Hence, chimeric genes can serve as an exceptional source of genetic novelty that can have a profound influence on adaptive evolution in D. melanogaster.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAdaptation, BiologicalAnimalsBiological EvolutionDrosophila melanogasterGene Expression ProfilingGenes, InsectGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationMutant Chimeric ProteinsMutationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, RNAMutant Chimeric Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21771717
PMCPMC3350314
OpenAlexW2128332765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.