Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21771023›Full record

ArticleHistopathology2011

Hybridization for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in gastric carcinoma: a comparison of fluorescence in-situ hybridization with a novel fully automated dual-colour silver in-situ hybridization method.

Elena García-García, Carlos Gómez-Martín, Bárbara Angulo, Esther Conde, Ana Suárez-Gauthier, Magdalena Adrados, Cristian Perna, José Luis Rodríguez-Peralto, Manuel Hidalgo, Fernando López-Ríos

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Histopathology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Significance of concurrent evaluation of HER2 gene amplification and p53 and Ki67 expression in gastric cancer tissues.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  3. Association of HER2 gene amplification and tumor progression in early gastric cancer.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. CHoMP: a chemoenzymatic histology method using clickable probes.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Consensus of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) for HER2 testing in gastric carcinoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elena García-GarcíaLaboratorio de Dianas Terapeuticas, Centro Integral Oncologico Clara Campal, Hospital Universitario Madrid Sanchinarro, C ⁄ On˜a, 10. 28050 Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Gómez-Martín
Bárbara Angulo
Esther Conde
Ana Suárez-Gauthier
Magdalena Adrados
Cristian Perna
José Luis Rodríguez-Peralto
Manuel Hidalgo
Fernando López-Ríos

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAmplification of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene has been reported in gastric carcinoma (GC). Accordingly, trastuzumab plus chemotherapy has recently become the new standard treatment for HER2-positive advanced GCs. The aim was to compare the alleged gold standard for hybridization [fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH)] with a novel, fully automated brightfield dual-colour silver-enhanced in-situ hybridization (SISH) method. METHODS AND

resultsThe studies series was comprised of 166 GC samples. Additionally, tumours with discordant results obtained by FISH and SISH were analysed by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with the LightMix kit HER-2/neu. Of the samples, 17.5% and 21% were amplified by FISH and SISH, respectively. Heterogeneity was identified in up to 52% of cases. In 96.4% of cases, FISH showed the same results as SISH. All six discordant cases were positive by SISH and negative by FISH. On review of the FISH slides, all contradictory cases were polysomic and were confirmed to be negative for amplification by real-time PCR. Interestingly, all ratios in this latter group were between 2.06 and 2.50, so setting the cut-off for amplification at ≥3 resulted in perfect concordance.

conclusionsDual-colour SISH represents a novel method for the determination of HER2 status in GC.

Indexed as

Genes, erbB-2AdenocarcinomaAutomation, LaboratoryGene AmplificationGene DosageHumansIn Situ HybridizationIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSilverStomach NeoplasmsSilver

Identifiers

PMID21771023
PMCPMC3166662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.