Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21770941›Full record

ArticleJournal of microscopy2011

Silicon nitride windows for electron microscopy of whole cells.

E A Ring, D B Peckys, M J Dukes, J P Baudoin, N de Jonge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microscopy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. High-Resolution Imaging of Human Viruses in Liquid Droplets.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Indirect magnetic force microscopy.Nanoscale advances · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Visualizing virus particle mobility in liquid at the nanoscale.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

E A RingMolecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, USA.
D B Peckys
M J Dukes
J P Baudoin
N de Jonge

Funding

Three dimensional aberration corrected scanning transmission electron microscopyR01GM081801 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI PISTON, DAVID W · 2008 to 2011
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081801NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM081801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Silicon microchips with thin, electron transparent silicon nitride windows provide a sample support that accommodates both light-, and electron microscopy of whole eukaryotic cells in vacuum or liquid, with minimum sample preparation steps. The windows are robust enough that cellular samples can be cultured directly onto them, with no addition of a supporting film, and there is no need to embed or section the sample, as is typically required in electron microscopy. By combining two microchips, a microfluidic chamber can be constructed for the imaging of samples in liquid in the electron microscope. We provide microchip design specifications, a fabrication outline, instructions on how to prepare the microchips for biological samples, and examples of images obtained using different light and electron microscopy modalities. The use of these microchips is particularly advantageous for correlative light and electron microscopy.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomedical ResearchChlorocebus aethiopsCOS CellsMicrofluidicsMicroscopy, ElectronSilicon CompoundsSilicon Compoundssilicon nitride

Identifiers

PMID21770941
PMCPMC3387365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.