ReviewDrugs2011
Eribulin.
Review in Drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of eribulin versus dacarbazine in patients with advanced liposarcoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Effects of BYL-719 (alpelisib) on human breast cancer stem cells to overcome drug resistance in human breast cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- The role of neuromuscular ultrasound in diagnostics of peripheral neuropathies induced by cytostatic agents or immunotherapies.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2023Article
- Eribulin normalizes pancreatic cancer-associated fibroblasts by simulating selected features of TGFβ inhibition.BMC cancer · 2022Article
- Breaking the Bottleneck in Anticancer Drug Development: Efficient Utilization of Synthetic Biology.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Considerations for interactions of drugs used for the treatment of COVID-19 with anti-cancer treatments.Critical reviews in oncology/hematology · 2020Review
- Novel phase I study combining G1 phase, S phase, and G2/M phase cell cycle inhibitors in patients with advanced malignancies.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eribulin (eribulin mesylate) is a non-taxane microtubule dynamics inhibitor with tubulin-based antimitotic activity and chemotherapeutic effects. Eribulin is used in the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have previously been treated with at least two chemotherapeutic regimens, including an anthracycline and a taxane. In in vitro studies, eribulin displayed antiproliferative activity against human breast cancer cell lines. Regression and elimination of breast tumours were observed in human tumour xenograft models. In the randomized, open-label, multinational, phase III EMBRACE trial in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, median overall survival was significantly longer in patients who received intravenous eribulin (n = 508) [13.1 months] compared with that in patients who received a treatment of physician's choice (n = 254) [10.6 months; hazard ratio 0.81; 95% CI 0.66, 0.99; p = 0.041]. Prior to enrolment, study participants had received between two and five chemotherapeutic regimens, including an anthracycline and a taxane. Consistent with the findings of earlier phase I and II trials, eribulin was reported to have a manageable tolerability profile in the EMBRACE trial. Peripheral neuropathy (incidence 5%) was the most common adverse event resulting in the discontinuation of eribulin treatment. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events in the eribulin group were neutropenia, leukopenia and asthenia or fatigue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.