Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21769671›Full record

ArticleMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2011

Clustered transcripts that escape X inactivation at mouse XqD.

Alexandra M Lopes, Sarah E Arnold-Croop, António Amorim, Laura Carrel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. When the Lyon(ized chromosome) roars: ongoing expression from an inactive X chromosome.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Variable escape from X-chromosome inactivation: identifying factors that tip the scales towards expression.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2014
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexandra M LopesInstitute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, R. Dr. Roberto Frias, S/N, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal. alopes@ipatimup.pt
Sarah E Arnold-Croop
António Amorim
Laura Carrel
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

COMPARATIVE GENOMIC AND FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF INACTIVE X EXPRESSIONR01HD056452 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI CARREL, LAURA · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS HD056452NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD056452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X Chromosome inactivation (XCI) silences one copy of most X-linked genes in female mammals. Notably, human and mouse differ strikingly in the number and organization of the genes that escape XCI. While on the human X Chromosome (Chr) escape genes are organized in domains, the few known genes that escape inactivation in the mouse appear to be isolated. Here we characterize the gene Cxorf26 and adjacent noncoding transcripts that map to XqD. We assess allelic expression in a nonrandomly X-inactivated cell line and directly demonstrate that 2610029G23Rik (Cxorf26) and its head-to-head neighbor (5530601H04Rik) escape X inactivation, creating a small escape domain. Both genes are robustly expressed from the inactive X Chr at approximately 50 and 30% of the expression levels of the active X, respectively. Additionally, consistent with XCI escape, the first exon of Cxorf26 is embedded within an unmethylated CpG island. To extend these results, we assayed ncRNAs adjacent to three other escape genes, Eif2s3x, Kdm5c, and Ddx3x. By allelic expression, three ncRNAs (D330035k16Rik, D930009k15Rik, and Gm16481) also escape X inactivation in the mouse, consistent with previous studies that reported female-biased expression. Altogether, these results establish that mouse escapees, like their human counterparts, can be clustered. Moreover, the fact that these ncRNAs are not found on the human X raises intriguing questions about potential regulatory roles of rapidly evolving ncRNAs in controlling escape gene expression.

Indexed as

Transcription, GeneticX ChromosomeX Chromosome InactivationAllelesAnimalsCell LineChromatinDNA MethylationFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationMicePolymorphism, Single NucleotidePromoter Regions, GeneticRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, UntranslatedChromatinRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, UntranslatedXIST non-coding RNA

Identifiers

PMID21769671
OpenAlexW2140317962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.