Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21769659›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2011

Reproductive factors and histologic subtype in relation to mortality after a breast cancer diagnosis.

S Warren Andersen, P A Newcomb, J M Hampton, L Titus-Ernstoff, K M Egan, A Trentham-Dietz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Association of Parity and Time since Last Birth with Breast Cancer Prognosis by Intrinsic Subtype.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Reproductive history and breast cancer risk.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S Warren AndersenUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, 610 Walnut St, WARF Room 307, Madison, WI 53726, USA. snandersen@wisc.edu
P A Newcomb
J M Hampton
L Titus-Ernstoff
K M Egan
A Trentham-Dietz

Funding

PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, LIFESTYLE AND OVARIAN CANCER RISKR01CA047147 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI NEWCOMB, POLLY A · 1988 to 2007
$2.6M
REGIONAL VARIATION OF BREAST CANCER RATES IN WISCONSINU01CA082004 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI REMINGTON, PATRICK L · 1999 to 2002
$970k
HORMONES, LIFESTYLE AND BREAST CANCERR01CA047305 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI EGAN, KATHLEEN · 1988 to 1999
–
HORMONES, LIFESTYLE, AND BREAST CANCERR01CA069664 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI TITUS-ERNSTOFF, LINDA · 1996 to 1999
–
NCI NIH HHS CA47147NCI NIH HHS CA82004NCI NIH HHS R01 CA047147NCI NIH HHS R01 CA047305NCI NIH HHS R01 CA069664NCI NIH HHS U01 CA082004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence suggests that certain reproductive factors are more strongly associated with the incidence of lobular than of ductal breast cancer. The mechanisms influencing breast cancer incidence histology may also affect survival. Women with invasive breast cancer (N = 22,302) diagnosed during 1986-2005 were enrolled in a series of population-based studies in three US states. Participants completed telephone interviews regarding reproductive exposures and other breast cancer risk factors. Histologic subtype was obtained from state cancer registries. Vital status and cause of death were determined through December 2006 using the National Death Index. Women were followed for 9.8 years on average with 3,050 breast cancer deaths documented. Adjusted hazard rate ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression models for breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality. Parity was inversely associated with breast cancer-specific mortality (P (Trend) = 0.002). Associations were similar though attenuated for all-cause mortality. In women diagnosed with ductal breast cancer, a 15% reduction in breast cancer-specific mortality was observed in women with five or more children when compared to those with no children (HR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.73-1.00). A similar inverse though non-significant association was observed in women with lobular subtype (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.43-1.14). The trend did not extend to mixed ductal-lobular breast cancer. Age at first birth had no consistent relationship with breast cancer-specific or all-cause mortality. We found increasing parity reduced mortality in ductal and lobular breast cancer. The number of full-term births, rather than age at first birth, has an effect on both breast cancer-specific and overall mortality.

Indexed as

Reproductive HistoryAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRisk FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID21769659
PMCPMC4306414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.