Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21769657›Full record

Trial reportPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2012

Longitudinal prediction and concurrent functioning of adolescent girls demonstrating various profiles of dating violence and victimization.

Debbie Chiodo, Claire V Crooks, David A Wolfe, Caroline McIsaac, Ray Hughes, Peter G Jaffe

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02140099 (Evaluation of the Healthy Relationships Plus Program for Youth), which is not on this map. Cited by 59 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02140099 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Healthy Relationships Plus Program for Youth

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthRan2014 to 2015Enrolled238ConditionsMental Health Wellness 1ArmsHealthy Relationships Plus Program (HRPP), Control Condition (Classroom Activities)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. The Efficacy of the "Dat-e Adolescence" Prevention Program in the Reduction of Dating Violence and Bullying.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Hostile home environment predicting early adolescent sexual harassment perpetration and potential school-related moderators.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Debbie ChiodoCAMH Centre for Prevention Science, 100 Collip Circle, Suite 100, London, Ontario N6G 4X8, Canada. dchiodo@uwo.ca
Claire V Crooks
David A Wolfe
Caroline McIsaac
Ray Hughes
Peter G Jaffe
Western University · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAYork University · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescent girls are involved in physical dating violence as both perpetrators and victims, and there are negative consequences associated with each of these behaviors. This article used a prospective design with 519 girls dating in grade 9 to predict profiles of dating violence in grade 11 based on relationships with families of origin (child maltreatment experiences, harsh parenting), and peers (harassment, delinquency, relational aggression). In addition, dating violence profiles were compared on numerous indices of adjustment (school connectedness, grades, self-efficacy and community connectedness) and maladjustment (suicide attempts, distress, delinquency, sexual behavior) for descriptive purposes. The most common profile was no dating violence (n = 367) followed by mutual violence (n = 81). Smaller numbers of girls reported victimization or perpetration only (ns = 39 and 32, respectively). Predicting grade 11 dating violence profile membership from grade 9 relationships was limited, although delinquency, parental rejection, and sexual harassment perpetration predicted membership to the mutually violent group, and delinquency predicted the perpetrator-only group. Compared to the non-violent group, the mutually violent girls in grade 11 had lower grades, poorer self-efficacy, and lower school connectedness and community involvement. Furthermore, they had higher rates of peer aggression and delinquency, were less likely to use condoms and were much more likely to have considered suicide. There were fewer differences among the profiles for girls involved with dating violence. In addition, the victims-only group reported higher rates of sexual intercourse, comparable to the mutually violent group and those involved in nonviolent relationships. Implications for prevention and intervention are highlighted.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorAdolescentAggressionAnalysis of VarianceChild AbuseCluster AnalysisCrime VictimsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleProspective StudiesPsychometricsRapeRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID21769657
OpenAlexW2120798912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.