ArticleMolecular biology reports2012
Association between promoter polymorphisms in a key cytoskeletal gene (Ankyrin 1) and intramuscular fat and water-holding capacity in porcine muscle.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expression mechanisms of mir-486-5p and its host gene sANK1 in porcine muscle.Molecular biology reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Identification of selection signatures in Iranian dromedary and Bactrian camels using whole genome sequencing data.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Sequence and haplotypes of ankyrin 1 gene (ANK1) and their association with carcass and meat quality traits in yak.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2021Article
- Mapping the genetic basis of diabetes mellitus in the Australian Burmese cat (Felis catus).Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Functional characterization of genetic polymorphisms identified in the promoter region of the bovine PEPS gene.DNA and cell biology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ankyrin 1 (ANK1) is a positional and functional candidate gene for both bovine and porcine meat quality. The objectives of this study were: (1) to determine if the gene expression levels of ANK1 are associated with pig meat quality traits; (2) to examine polymorphisms in the promoter region of the porcine ANK1 gene for association with meat quality in diverse breeds; and (3) to search for putative transcription factor binding sites predicted to be altered by such polymorphisms. ANK1 gene expression was positively correlated with drip loss (%) in the Large White breed. Twelve novel SNPs were discovered in a 761 bp region of the ANK1 promoter in three phenotypically diverse F1 cross populations. Five were subsequently selected for association analysis with meat quality traits and genotyped in three pure pig breeds (Pietrain n = 98, Duroc n = 99 and Large White n = 98). Two of these five SNPs were associated with meat quality traits at the Bonferroni significance threshold: g.-606G>A with drip loss % in the Pietrain breed and g.-272G>A with intramuscular fat (IMF) in the LTL and SM. Following haplotype construction from SNP genotypes, Haplotype 3 was found to be associated with drip loss % at the Bonferroni level of significance in the Pietrain breed and Haplotype 5 was associated at the Bonferroni level with IMF in two muscles in the Large White breed. Further associations were observed at the nominal significance threshold. Our conclusion from this study is that SNPs in the ANK1 gene promoter could potentially contribute to genome-assisted selection SNP panels to improve IMF and water holding capacity on a breed basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.