ArticleMolecular biotechnology2012
Identification of potential antisense transcripts in rice using conventional microarray.
Article in Molecular biotechnology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-wide identification and characterization of novel lncRNAs in Populus under nitrogen deficiency.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2016Article
- Prediction and identification of natural antisense transcripts and their small RNAs in soybean (Glycine max).BMC genomics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natural antisense transcripts (NATs) are endogenous transcripts that contain reverse complementary sequences to other RNAs (usually called sense transcripts). NATs regulate the expression of sense transcripts in a wide range of species. The identification and analysis of NATs are the prerequisite to elucidate their functions. Microarray is a genome-wide method to detect gene expression. However, conventional microarrays do not contain the specific probes of NATs; thus, they cannot be utilized to detect NATs. In this article, we developed a novel method to identify potential NATs with the conventional microarrays. In this method of our study, we labeled the first strand cDNA from one sample with Cy5 and labeled the second strand cDNA from another sample with Cy3, and then hybridized these labeled samples with oligonucleotide microarray. Using this method, we identified 920 potential NATs in rice variety Nipponbare. Among these potential NATs, 88 of them were confirmed by either full-length cDNA or orientated ESTs (expressed sequence tags). This is the first time that a conventional oligonucleotide microarray was employed to identify NATs in rice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21769472What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.