Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21769311›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry letters2011

Modulating Accidental Fermi Resonance: What a Difference a Neutron Makes.

Jacob S Lipkin, Rui Song, Edward E Fenlon, Scott H Brewer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry letters, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. TfNNACS omega · 2022
    Article
  8. Transparent window 2D IR spectroscopy of proteins.The Journal of chemical physics · 2021
    Review
  9. Extending the vibrational lifetime of azides with heavy atoms.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Site-specific infrared probes of proteins.Annual review of physical chemistry · 2015
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jacob S LipkinFranklin & Marshall College, Department of Chemistry, Lancaster, PA 17604-3003 USA.
Rui Song
Edward E Fenlon
Scott H Brewer

Funding

Use of Vibrational Reporters to Measure Dynamics and Distances in RNA and ProteinsR15GM093330 · NIGMS · FRANKLIN AND MARSHALL COLLEGE · PI BREWER, SCOTT H, FENLON, EDWARD EMMETT · 2010 to 2024
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM093330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vibrational reporters have shown significant promise as sensitive probes of local environments in proteins and nucleic acids. The utility of two potential vibrational probes, the cyanate and azide groups in phenyl cyanate and 3-azidopyridine, respectively, has been hindered by accidental Fermi resonance. Anharmonic coupling, between the fundamental -OCN or -N(3) asymmetric stretch vibration with a near resonant combination band, results in an extremely broad and complex absorption profile for each of these probes. A total of eight phenyl cyanate and six 3-azidopyridine isotopomers were synthesized and studied. Isotopic editing effectively modulated the accidental Fermi resonance - the absorption profiles of several isotopomers were greatly simplified while others remained complex. The origins of the observed profiles are discussed. Addition of a single neutron to the middle atom of the oscillator converted the absorption profile to essentially a single band resulting from either the cyanate or azide asymmetric stretch vibration.

Identifiers

PMID21769311
PMCPMC3137378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.