ArticleThe open respiratory medicine journal2011
Zinc lozenges may shorten the duration of colds: a systematic review.
Article in The open respiratory medicine journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.
- Zinc for prevention and treatment of the common cold.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Zinc acetate lozenges for treating the common cold: an individual patient data meta-analysis.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Pooled it
- The effectiveness of high dose zinc acetate lozenges on various common cold symptoms: a meta-analysis.BMC family practice · 2015Pooled it
- Zinc for the treatment of the common cold: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2012Pooled it
- Zinc acetate lozenges for the treatment of the common cold: a randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2020Trial
- Duration of the common cold and similar continuous outcomes should be analyzed on the relative scale: a case study of two zinc lozenge trials.BMC medical research methodology · 2017Trial
- A comprehensive review of the physiology and evidence base to guide the use of ergogenic and medical supplements for enhanced cycling performance.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2026Review
- Open, Randomised, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Role of a Dietary Supplement ContainingChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Is Micronutrient Supplementation Helpful in Supporting the Immune System during Prolonged, High-Intensity Physical Training?Nutrients · 2024Review
- Shortcomings in the Cochrane review on zinc for the common cold (2024).Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Zinc Supplementation Associated With a Decrease in Mortality in COVID-19 Patients: A Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2023Review
- Efficacy and tolerability of zinc acetate for treatment of chronic refractory cough: pilot randomised futility trial.ERJ open research · 2023Article
- Commentary: Quantile treatment effect of zinc lozenges on common cold duration: A novel approach to analyze the effect of treatment on illness duration.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Understanding How Minerals Contribute to Optimal Immune Function.Journal of immunology research · 2023Review
- Zinc associated nanomaterials and their intervention in emerging respiratory viruses: Journey to the field of biomedicine and biomaterials.Coordination chemistry reviews · 2022Review
- Review
- Divalent Metal Uptake and the Role of ZIP8 in Host Defense Against Pathogens.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Quantile Treatment Effect of Zinc Lozenges on Common Cold Duration: A Novel Approach to Analyze the Effect of Treatment on Illness Duration.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Role of different types of nanomaterials against diagnosis, prevention and therapy of COVID-19.Sustainable cities and society · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA number of controlled trials have examined the effect of zinc lozenges on the common cold but the findings have diverged. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the total daily dose of zinc might explain part of the variation in the results.
methodsThe Medline, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials data bases were searched for placebocontrolled trials examining the effect of zinc lozenges on common cold duration. Two methods were used for analysis: the P-values of the trials were combined by using the Fisher method and the results of the trials were pooled by using the inverse-variance method. Both approaches were used for all the identified trials and separately for the low zinc dose and the high zinc dose trials.
resultsThirteen placebo-controlled comparisons have examined the therapeutic effect of zinc lozenges on common cold episodes of natural origin. Five of the trials used a total daily zinc dose of less than 75 mg and uniformly found no effect. Three trials used zinc acetate in daily doses of over 75 mg, the pooled result indicating a 42% reduction in the duration of colds (95% CI: 35% to 48%). Five trials used zinc salts other than acetate in daily doses of over 75 mg, the pooled result indicating a 20% reduction in the duration of colds (95% CI: 12% to 28%).
conclusionsThis study shows strong evidence that the zinc lozenge effect on common cold duration is heterogeneous so that benefit is observed with high doses of zinc but not with low doses. The effects of zinc lozenges should be further studied to determine the optimal lozenge compositions and treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.