Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21769165›Full record

ArticleJournal of polymer science. Part B, Polymer physics2011

Biomedical Applications of Biodegradable Polymers.

Bret D Ulery, Lakshmi S Nair, Cato T Laurencin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of polymer science. Part B, Polymer physics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 453 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
453citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

453 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Review on Biodegradable Materials of Sustainable Soft Robotics and Electronics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. A long-term quasi-equivalentBioactive materials · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

393 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bret D UleryDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Musculoskeletal Institute, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut 06030.
Lakshmi S Nair
Cato T Laurencin

Funding

Polymer/Ceramic Composites for Tissue EngineeringR01AR052536 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI LAURENCIN, CATO T. · 2005 to 2009
$1.4M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR052536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Utilization of polymers as biomaterials has greatly impacted the advancement of modern medicine. Specifically, polymeric biomaterials that are biodegradable provide the significant advantage of being able to be broken down and removed after they have served their function. Applications are wide ranging with degradable polymers being used clinically as surgical sutures and implants. In order to fit functional demand, materials with desired physical, chemical, biological, biomechanical and degradation properties must be selected. Fortunately, a wide range of natural and synthetic degradable polymers has been investigated for biomedical applications with novel materials constantly being developed to meet new challenges. This review summarizes the most recent advances in the field over the past 4 years, specifically highlighting new and interesting discoveries in tissue engineering and drug delivery applications.

Identifiers

PMID21769165
PMCPMC3136871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.