Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21769135›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of gastroenterology2011

Lynch syndrome-associated extracolonic tumors are rare in two extended families with the same EPCAM deletion.

Henry T Lynch, Douglas L Riegert-Johnson, Carrie Snyder, Jane F Lynch, Jill Hagenkord, C Richard Boland, Jennifer Rhees, Stephen N Thibodeau, Lisa A Boardman, Janine Davies and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Diagnostics of Mutations in MMR/Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. An American patient with polyposis carrying a ScandinavianHereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Milestones of Lynch syndrome: 1895-2015.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2015
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. History, genetics, and strategies for cancer prevention in Lynch syndrome.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
  20. The history of Lynch syndrome.Familial cancer · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Henry T LynchDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska 68178, USA. htlynch@creighton.edu
Douglas L Riegert-Johnson
Carrie Snyder
Jane F Lynch
Jill Hagenkord
C Richard Boland
Jennifer Rhees
Stephen N Thibodeau
Lisa A Boardman
Janine Davies
Roland P Kuiper
Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg
Creighton University · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NLBaylor University Medical Center · USMayo Clinic · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USWinnMed · US

Funding

The Biology and Diagnosis of HNPCCR01CA072851 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO · PI GOEL, AJAY · 1996 to 2019
$6.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA072851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe Lynch syndrome (LS) is an inherited cancer syndrome showing a preponderance of colorectal cancer (CRC) in context with endometrial cancer and several other extracolonic cancers, which is due to pathogenic mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2. Some families were found to show a LS phenotype without an identified MMR mutation, although there was microsatellite instability and absence of MSH2 expression by immunohistochemistry. Studies of a subset of these families found a deletion at the 3' end of the epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EPCAM) gene, causing transcription read-through resulting in silencing of MSH2 through hypermethylation of its promoter. The tumor spectrum of such families appears to differ from classical LS.

methodsOur study of two large families (USA Family R and Dutch Family A) with an EPCAM deletion was carried out using each institution's standard family study protocol. DNA was extracted from peripheral blood and EPCAM deletion analysis was performed.

resultsBoth families were found to harbor the same deletion at the 3' end of EPCAM. Analysis showed that the deletion originated from a common ancestor. Family R and Family A members showed segregation of CRC with the presence of this EPCAM mutation. Compared with classic LS, there were almost no extracolonic cancers.

conclusionsMembers of Family R and Family A, all with the same EPCAM deletion, predominantly presented with CRC but no LS-associated endometrial cancer, confirming findings seen in other, smaller, LS families with EPCAM mutations. In these EPCAM mutation carriers, cancer surveillance should be focused on CRC.

Indexed as

Gene DeletionGene SilencingAdultAgedAntigens, NeoplasmCell Adhesion MoleculesColorectal NeoplasmsColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisDNA MethylationEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeFemaleHumansMaleMicrosatellite InstabilityMiddle AgedMutS Homolog 2 ProteinAntigens, NeoplasmCell Adhesion MoleculesEPCAM protein, humanEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeMSH2 protein, humanMutS Homolog 2 Protein

Identifiers

PMID21769135
PMCPMC3805505
OpenAlexW2129434210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.