Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21768471›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2011

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell support as adjuvant therapy in breast cancer: overview of 15 randomized trials.

Donald A Berry, Naoto T Ueno, Marcella M Johnson, Xiudong Lei, Jean Caputo, Sjoerd Rodenhuis, William P Peters, Robert C Leonard, William E Barlow, Martin S Tallman and 14 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Long-term survival after high-dose chemotherapy followed by peripheral stem cell rescue for high-risk, locally advanced/inflammatory, and metastatic breast cancer.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2012
    Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Treating Metastatic Brain Cancers With Stem Cells.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Is there expert consensus on expert consensus?Bone marrow transplantation · 2018
    Article
  17. A Review of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Metastatic Breast Cancer.International journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research · 2018
    Review
  18. Observational
  19. Standardizing haematopoietic cell transplants in China.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2018
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Donald A BerryDivision of Quantitative Sciences, Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230-1402, USA. dberry@mdanderson.org
Naoto T Ueno
Marcella M Johnson
Xiudong Lei
Jean Caputo
Sjoerd Rodenhuis
William P Peters
Robert C Leonard
William E Barlow
Martin S Tallman
Jonas Bergh
Ulrike A Nitz
Alessandro M Gianni
Russell L Basser
Axel R Zander
R Charles Coombes
Henri Roché
Yutaka Tokuda
Elisabeth G E de Vries
Gabriel N Hortobagyi
John P Crown
Paolo Pedrazzoli
Marco Bregni
Taner Demirer
Ankara University · TRGruppo Italiano per il Trapianto di Midollo Osseo · ITInstitut Claudius Regaud · FRIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITKarolinska Institutet · SETokai University · JPUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdjuvant high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (AHST) for high-risk primary breast cancer has not been shown to prolong survival. Individual trials have had limited power to show overall benefit or benefits within subsets.

methodsWe assembled individual patient data from 15 randomized trials that compared HDC versus control therapy without stem-cell support. Prospectively defined primary end points were relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). We compared the effect of HDC versus control by using log-rank tests and proportional hazards regression, and we adjusted for clinically relevant covariates. Subset analyses were by age, number of positive lymph nodes, tumor size, histology, hormone receptor (HmR) status, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status.

resultsOf 6,210 total patients (n = 3,118, HDC; n = 3,092 control), the median age was 46 years; 69% were premenopausal, 29% were postmenopausal, and 2% were unknown menopausal status; 49.5% were HmR positive; 33.5% were HmR negative, and 17% were unknown HmR status. The median follow-up was 6 years. After analysis was adjusted for covariates, HDC was found to prolong relapse-free survival (RFS; hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.93; P < .001) but not overall survival (OS; HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.02; P = .13). For OS, no covariates had statistically significant interactions with treatment effect, and no subsets evinced a significant effect of HDC. Younger patients had a significantly better RFS on HDC than did older patients.

conclusionAdjuvant HDC with AHST prolonged RFS in high-risk primary breast cancer compared with control, but this did not translate into a significant OS benefit. Whether HDC benefits patients in the context of targeted therapies is unknown.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAdultAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Second PrimaryRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTransplantation, AutologousAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID21768471
PMCPMC4322115
OpenAlexW2143596381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.