Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21768444›Full record

ArticleArchives of dermatology2011

Response to antimalarial agents in cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a prospective analysis.

Aileen Y Chang, Evan W Piette, Kristen P Foering, Thomas R Tenhave, Joyce Okawa, Victoria P Werth

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of dermatology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. What's New in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: Guidelines, Biologics, and Beyond.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha: Ally and Enemy in Protean Cutaneous Sceneries.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Recent Insight on the Management of Lupus Erythematosus Alopecia.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aileen Y ChangPhiladelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Evan W Piette
Kristen P Foering
Thomas R Tenhave
Joyce Okawa
Victoria P Werth
Veterans Health Administration · US

Funding

PATIENT-ORIENTED RESEARCH IN SKIN AUTOMMUNE DISEASEK24AR002207 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WERTH, VICTORIA P · 2001 to 2012
$1.3M
NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR002207NIAMS NIH HHS K24-AR 18 02207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo demonstrate response to antimalarial agents in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) using activity scores from the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index, a validated outcome measure.

designProspective, longitudinal cohort study.

settingUniversity cutaneous autoimmune disease clinic.

participantsA total of 128 patients with CLE who presented from January 2007 to July 2010 and had at least 2 visits with activity scores.

interventionAdministration of antimalarial agents.

main outcome measuresResponse was defined by a 4-point or 20% decrease in activity score. Response to initiation was determined by the difference between the scores before treatment and at the first visit at least 2 months after treatment. Response to continuation was determined by the difference between the scores at the first visit and the most recent visit while undergoing treatment.

resultsOf 11 patients who initiated treatment with hydroxychloroquine, 55% were responders (n = 6), showing a decrease in median (interquartile range [IQR]) activity score from 8.0 (3.5-13.0) to 3.0 (1.8-7.3) (P = .03). Of 15 patients for whom hydroxychloroquine failed, 67% were responders to initiation of hydroxychloroquine-quinacrine therapy (n = 10), showing a decrease in median (IQR) activity score from 6.0 (4.8-8.3) to 3.0 (0.75-5.0) (P = .004). Nine of 21 patients who continued hydroxychloroquine treatment (43%), and 9 of 21 patients who continued hydroxychloroquine-quinacrine (43%) were responders, showing a decrease in median (IQR) activity score from 6.0 (1.5-9.5) to 1.0 (0.0-4.5) (P = .01) and 8.5 (4.25-17.5) to 5.0 (0.5-11.5) (P = .01), respectively.

conclusionsThe use of quinacrine with hydroxychloroquine is associated with response in patients for whom hydroxychloroquine monotherapy fails. Further reduction in disease activity can be associated with continuation of treatment with antimalarial agents.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntimalarialsCohort StudiesDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHydroxychloroquineLongitudinal StudiesLupus Erythematosus, CutaneousMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuinacrineAntimalarialsHydroxychloroquineQuinacrine

Identifiers

PMID21768444
PMCPMC3282057
OpenAlexW1989175460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.